ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011
Quantitative metagenomic analyses based on average genome size normalization.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mining Microbial Dark Matter: Advanced Cultivation Techniques for Bioactive Compound Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with application to microbiome cancer research.Gut microbes · 2023Review
- Exploring the Interspecific Interactions and the Metabolome of the Soil Isolate Hylemonella gracilis.mSystems · 2023Article
- Toward Accurate and Robust Environmental Surveillance Using Metagenomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Dental Calculus as a Tool to Study the Evolution of the Mammalian Oral Microbiome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Revised computational metagenomic processing uncovers hidden and biologically meaningful functional variation in the human microbiome.Microbiome · 2017Article
- Glycoside Hydrolases across Environmental Microbial Communities.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Sources of airborne microorganisms in the built environment.Microbiome · 2015Article
- Average genome size estimation improves comparative metagenomics and sheds light on the functional ecology of the human microbiome.Genome biology · 2015Article
- MUSiCC: a marker genes based framework for metagenomic normalization and accurate profiling of gene abundances in the microbiome.Genome biology · 2015Article
- Year-Long Metagenomic Study of River Microbiomes Across Land Use and Water Quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology.The ISME journal · 2014Review
- Bioinformatic approaches for functional annotation and pathway inference in metagenomics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Review
- Metagenomic analyses of drinking water receiving different disinfection treatments.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2012Article
- Metagenome analyses of corroded concrete wastewater pipe biofilms reveal a complex microbial system.BMC microbiology · 2012Article
- Microbial rhodopsins on leaf surfaces of terrestrial plants.Environmental microbiology · 2012Article
- The significance of nitrogen cost minimization in proteomes of marine microorganisms.The ISME journal · 2012Article
- Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past quarter-century, microbiologists have used DNA sequence information to aid in the characterization of microbial communities. During the last decade, this has expanded from single genes to microbial community genomics, or metagenomics, in which the gene content of an environment can provide not just a census of the community members but direct information on metabolic capabilities and potential interactions among community members. Here we introduce a method for the quantitative characterization and comparison of microbial communities based on the normalization of metagenomic data by estimating average genome sizes. This normalization can relieve comparative biases introduced by differences in community structure, number of sequencing reads, and sequencing read lengths between different metagenomes. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by comparing metagenomes from two different marine sources using both conventional small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene analyses and our quantitative method to calculate the proportion of genomes in each sample that are capable of a particular metabolic trait. With both environments, to determine what proportion of each community they make up and how differences in environment affect their abundances, we characterize three different types of autotrophic organisms: aerobic, photosynthetic carbon fixers (the Cyanobacteria); anaerobic, photosynthetic carbon fixers (the Chlorobi); and anaerobic, nonphotosynthetic carbon fixers (the Desulfobacteraceae). These analyses demonstrate how genome proportionality compares to SSU rRNA gene relative abundance and how factors such as average genome size and SSU rRNA gene copy number affect sampling probability and therefore both types of community analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.