Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21317265›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Contribution of rapid evolution of the luxR-luxI intergenic region to the diverse bioluminescence outputs of Vibrio fischeri strains isolated from different environments.

Jeffrey L Bose, Michael S Wollenberg, Deanna M Colton, Mark J Mandel, Alecia N Septer, Anne K Dunn, Eric V Stabb

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tools for Rapid Genetic Engineering of Vibrio fischeri.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L BoseUniversity of Georgia, Department of Microbiology, 1000 Cedar Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Michael S Wollenberg
Deanna M Colton
Mark J Mandel
Alecia N Septer
Anne K Dunn
Eric V Stabb
University of Georgia · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
VIBRIO VIRULENCE DETERMINANTS IN A BENIGN COLONIZATIONR01RR012294 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RUBY, EDWARD G · 1996 to 2011
$6.4M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR012294NCRR NIH HHS RR12294NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM007215-35NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrio fischeri serves as a valuable model of bacterial bioluminescence, its regulation, and its functional significance. Light output varies more than 10,000-fold in wild-type isolates from different environments, yet dim and bright strains have similar organization of the light-producing lux genes, with the activator-encoding luxR divergently transcribed from luxICDABEG. By comparing the genomes of bright strain MJ11 and the dimmer ES114, we found that the lux region has diverged more than most shared orthologs, including those flanking lux. Divergence was particularly high in the intergenic sequence between luxR and luxI. Analysis of the intergenic lux region from 18 V. fischeri strains revealed that, with one exception, sequence divergence essentially mirrored strain phylogeny but with relatively high substitution rates. The bases conserved among intergenic luxR-luxI sequences included binding sites for known regulators, such as LuxR and ArcA, and bases of unknown significance, including a striking palindromic repeat. By using this collection of diverse luxR-luxI regions, we found that expression of P(luxI)-lacZ but not P(luxR)-lacZ transcriptional reporters correlated with the luminescence output of the strains from which the promoters originated. We also found that exchange of a small stretch of the luxI-luxR intergenic region between two strains largely reversed their relative brightness. Our results show that the luxR-luxI intergenic region contributes significantly to the variable luminescence output among V. fischeri strains isolated from different environments, although other elements of strain backgrounds also contribute. Moreover, the lux system appears to have evolved relatively rapidly, suggesting unknown environment-specific selective pressures.

Indexed as

DNA, IntergenicGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPolymorphism, GeneticAliivibrio fischeriArtificial Gene FusionBacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidaseBinding SitesEvolution, MolecularGenes, ReporterMolecular Sequence DataRepressor ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNATrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsBacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidaseDNA, IntergenicLuxI protein, BacteriaLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21317265
PMCPMC3067414
OpenAlexW2109521534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.