Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21317047›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2011

RAD51-independent inverted-repeat recombination by a strand-annealing mechanism.

Christina Mott, Lorraine S Symington

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeastComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Break-induced replication links microsatellite expansion to complex genome rearrangements.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA damage during the G0/G1 phase triggers RNA-templated, Cockayne syndrome B-dependent homologous recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina MottDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, 701 W. 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Lorraine S Symington
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Homologous Recombination in YeastR01GM041784 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SYMINGTON, LORRAINE S · 1989 to 2017
$7.8M
MECHANISMS OF DOUBLE STRAND BREAK REPAIR IN YEASTR01GM054099 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SYMINGTON, LORRAINE S · 1997 to 2009
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM041784NIGMS NIH HHS GM054099NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041784NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination between inverted repeats is RAD52 dependent, but reduced only modestly in the rad51Δ mutant. RAD59 is required for RAD51-independent inverted-repeat recombination, but no clear mechanism for how recombination occurs in the absence of RAD51 has emerged. Because Rad59 is thought to function as an accessory factor for the single-strand annealing activity of Rad52 one possible mechanism for spontaneous recombination could be by strand annealing between repeats at a stalled replication fork. Here we demonstrate the importance of the Rad52 single-strand annealing activity for generating recombinants by showing suppression of the rad52Δ, rad51Δ rad52Δ and rad52Δ rad59Δ inverted-repeat recombination defects by the rfa1-D228Y mutation. In addition, formation of recombinants in the rad51Δ mutant was sensitive to the distance between the inverted repeats, consistent with a replication-based mechanism. Deletion of RAD5 or RAD18, which are required for error-free post-replication repair, reduced the recombination rate in the rad59Δ mutant, but not in wild type. These data are consistent with RAD51-independent recombinants arising by a faulty template switch mechanism that is distinct from nascent strand template switching.

Indexed as

AllelesDNA RepairDNA, Single-StrandedGene OrderGenes, FungalInverted Repeat SequencesMutationRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRecombination, GeneticYeastsDNA, Single-StrandedRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination Protein

Identifiers

PMID21317047
PMCPMC3062727
OpenAlexW1973891663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.