Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21316394›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2011

Predictive validity of a non-induced mouse model of compulsive-like behavior.

D M Greene-Schloesser, E A Van der Zee, D K Sheppard, M R Castillo, K A Gregg, T Burrow, H Foltz, M Slater, A Bult-Ito

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D M Greene-SchloesserBehavioral and Evolutionary Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Biology and Wildlife & Institute of Arctic Biology, PO Box 756100, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6100, USA.
E A Van der Zee
D K Sheppard
M R Castillo
K A Gregg
T Burrow
H Foltz
M Slater
A Bult-Ito
University of Alaska Fairbanks · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Rac-1 mediated superoxide signaling in neuronsU54NS041069 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI DUFFY, LAWRENCE K · 2000 to 2011
$14.1M
NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS041069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key to advancing the understanding of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-like symptoms is the development of spontaneous animal models. Over 55 generations of bidirectional selection for nest-building behavior in house mice, Mus musculus, resulted in a 40-fold difference in the amount of cotton used for a nest in high (BIG) and low (SMALL) selected lines. The nesting behavior of BIG mice appears to be compulsive-like and has initial face validity as an animal model for OCD in humans. Compulsive-like digging behavior was assessed; BIG male mice buried about three times as many marbles as SMALL male mice, strengthening face validity. Using the open field and elevated plus maze, SMALL male mice showed higher levels of anxiety/fear-like behavior than BIG male mice, indicating that compulsive-like and not anxiety-like behavior was measured. To establish predictive validity, chronic (4 weeks) oral administration of fluoxetine (30, 50 and 100mg/kg/day) and clomipramine (80 mg/kg/day), both effective in treating OCD, significantly reduced compulsive-like nest-building behavior in BIG male mice. Compulsive-like digging behavior was also significantly reduced by chronic oral fluoxetine (30 and 80 mg/kg/day) treatment in BIG male mice. General locomotor activity was not affected by chronic oral fluoxetine (30 and 80 mg/kg/day) treatment; chronic oral treatment with desipramine (30 mg/kg/day), an antidepressant not effective in treating OCD, had no effect on nesting behavior of BIG male mice, strengthening predictive validity. Together, the results indicate that these mice have good face and predictive validity as a non-induced mouse model of compulsive-like behavior relevant to OCD.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMice, Inbred StrainsAnimalsAnxietyBehavior, AnimalClomipramineCompulsive BehaviorDesipramineExploratory BehaviorFluoxetineMaleMaze LearningMiceMotor ActivityNesting BehaviorClomipramineDesipramineFluoxetine

Identifiers

PMID21316394
PMCPMC3097060
OpenAlexW2012460043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.