Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21315458›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2011

Slitrks as emerging candidate genes involved in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Catia C Proenca, Kate P Gao, Sergey V Shmelkov, Shahin Rafii, Francis S Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alterations ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Human mutations inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catia C ProencaDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA. ccp2001@med.cornell.edu
Kate P Gao
Sergey V Shmelkov
Shahin Rafii
Francis S Lee

Funding

The Impact of the BDNF Val66Met Prodomain on Cognitive Function in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01NS052819 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HEMPSTEAD, BARBARA L, LEE, FRANCIS SANG YONG · 2005 to 2019
$5.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slitrks are a family of structurally related transmembrane proteins belonging to the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) superfamily. Six family members exist (Slitrk1-6) and all are highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). Slitrks have been implicated in mediating basic neuronal processes, ranging from neurite outgrowth and dendritic elaboration to neuronal survival. Recent studies in humans and genetic mouse models have led to the identification of Slitrks as candidate genes that might be involved in the development of neuropsychiatric conditions, such as obsessive compulsive spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Although these system-level approaches have suggested that Slitrks play prominent roles in CNS development, key questions remain regarding the molecular mechanisms through which they mediate neuronal signaling and connectivity.

Indexed as

Multigene FamilyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMembrane ProteinsMental DisordersNerve Tissue ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSLITRK1 protein, humanSLITRK4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21315458
PMCPMC3051006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.