Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21315151›Full record

ArticleMechanisms of development

Functional analysis of conserved sequences within a temporally restricted neural precursor cell enhancer.

Alexander Kuzin, Mukta Kundu, Thomas Brody, Ward F Odenwald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mechanisms of development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of a Drosophila genome-wide conserved sequence database to identify functionally related cis-regulatory enhancers.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander KuzinNeural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH Bethesda, MD, USA. alex.kuzin@ninds.nih.gov
Mukta Kundu
Thomas Brody
Ward F Odenwald
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell cis-Regulatory EnhancersZIANS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2010 to 2017
$5.3M
Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZ01NS002820 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 1990 to 2008
$2.5M
Analysis Of Gene Expression Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZIHNS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2009 to 2009
$1.2M
Identification of Functionally Related Drosophila cis-Regulatory DNAZIHNS009413 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2010 to 2010
$333k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS002820Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002820Intramural NIH HHS ZIH NS002820Intramural NIH HHS ZIH NS009413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the key regulators of Drosophila CNS neural identity are expressed in defined temporal orders during neuroblast (NB) lineage development. To begin to understand the structural and functional complexity of enhancers that regulate ordered NB gene expression programs, we have undertaken the mutational analysis of the temporally restricted nerfin-1 NB enhancer. Our previous studies have localized the enhancer to a region just proximal to the nerfin-1 transcription start site. Analysis of this enhancer, using the phylogenetic footprint program EvoPrinter, reveals the presence of multiple sequence blocks that are conserved among drosophilids. cis-Decoder alignments of these conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) has identified shorter elements that are conserved in other Drosophila NB enhancers. Mutagenesis of the enhancer reveals that although each CSB is required for wild-type expression, neither position nor orientation of the CSBs within the enhancer is crucial for enhancer function; removal of less-conserved or non-conserved sequences flanking CSB clusters also does not significantly alter enhancer activity. While all three conserved E-box transcription factor (TF) binding sites (CAGCTG) are required for full function, adding an additional site at different locations within non-conserved sequences interferes with enhancer activity. Of particular note, none of the mutations resulted in ectopic reporter expression outside of the early NB expression window, suggesting that the temporally restricted pattern is defined by transcriptional activators and not by direct DNA binding repressors. Our work also points to an unexpectedly large number of TFs required for optimal enhancer function - mutant TF analysis has identified at least four that are required for full enhancer regulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCentral Nervous SystemConserved SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsE-Box ElementsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenes, ReporterIn Situ HybridizationMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Stem CellsNeuronsSequence DeletionDrosophila Proteinsnerfin-1 protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21315151
PMCPMC3095431
OpenAlexW2061912426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.