Trial reportJournal of community health2011
Evaluating a community based participatory approach to research with disadvantaged women in the southern suburbs of Beirut.
Trial report in Journal of community health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.The Milbank quarterly · 2016Pooled it
- The Relaxation Exercise and Social Support Trial (RESST): a community-based randomized controlled trial to alleviate medically unexplained vaginal discharge symptoms.BMC psychiatry · 2012Trial
- Process evaluation of a psychosocial intervention addressing women in a disadvantaged setting.Global journal of health science · 2011Trial
- Perceptions of abused Chinese women on community-based participatory approach programme in addressing their needs.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- "For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Community-Academic Partnership Participation.Community mental health journal · 2016Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of self-efficacy and social capital in a community-based healthy village project in Santa Cruz, Bolivia.BMC international health and human rights · 2015Article
- Women's experiences in a community-based participatory research randomized controlled trial.Qualitative health research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This manuscript presents the evaluation of a 3 year community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach involving the testing of a psychosocial intervention to improve reproductive and mental health of married women in a disadvantaged community in Beirut, Lebanon. The community-based participatory approach involved a community advisory committee (CAC), a local women committee (LWC), and university researchers. The evaluation of the CBPR approach followed qualitative assessment which included: analysis of compiled field notes and minutes of meetings of CAC and LWC throughout the 3 years of the intervention, and focus group discussions and individual interviews conducted with the CAC and the LWC members following completion of the trial. The CBPR approach confirmed feasibility, cultural adequacy, as well as representation of community needs. Five main emerging themes came out of the FGD and interviews with CAC and LWC. The community and women involved viewed that the CBPR approach allowed for a good understanding of the community, they felt ownership of the study, acknowledged that participation gave the women voices, and established trust, and acknowledged the challenges faced. This manuscript describes how the community was involved, reports on their evaluation of the CBPR process, and discusses challenges to CBPR in this particular context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21311960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.