Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21311584›Full record

ReviewPLoS medicine2011

A research agenda for malaria eradication: basic science and enabling technologies.

malERA Consultative Group on Basic Science and Enabling Technologies

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metabolomics in the fight against malaria.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. High genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax on the north coast of Papua New Guinea.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Gilberger, Tim [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

malERA Consultative Group on Basic Science and Enabling Technologies

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501670Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's malaria control efforts are limited by our incomplete understanding of the biology of Plasmodium and of the complex relationships between human populations and the multiple species of mosquito and parasite. Research priorities include the development of in vitro culture systems for the complete life cycle of P. falciparum and P. vivax and the development of an appropriate liver culture system to study hepatic stages. In addition, genetic technologies for the manipulation of Plasmodium need to be improved, the entire parasite metabolome needs to be characterized to identify new druggable targets, and improved information systems for monitoring the changes in epidemiology, pathology, and host-parasite-vector interactions as a result of intensified control need to be established to bridge the gap between bench, preclinical, clinical, and population-based sciences.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyResearchAnimalsAntimalarialsCulicidaeDrug ResistanceHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansInsect VectorsInterdisciplinary CommunicationLiverMalariaMetabolomicsModels, AnimalModels, BiologicalMosquito ControlAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID21311584
PMCPMC3026698
OpenAlexW1518187591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.