Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21310829›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2011

The timing and duration of a sensitive period in human flavor learning: a randomized trial.

Julie A Mennella, Laura D Lukasewycz, Sara M Castor, Gary K Beauchamp

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00994747 nacompletednot on this map

Sensitive Periods in Early Flavor Learning

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonell Chemical Senses CenterRan2006 to 2010Enrolled79ConditionsHealthyArmsNutramigen (Flavor and Type of Infant Formula), Enfamil, milk-based formula
NCT01667549 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Sensitive Periods in Human Flavor Learning

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonell Chemical Senses CenterRan2012 to 2015Enrolled97ConditionsDevelopmentArmsTiming of Diet and Flavor Experience
NCT01700205 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Diet Composition on Energy Balance and Satiety During Infancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonell Chemical Senses CenterRan2012 to 2016Enrolled113ConditionsDevelopmentArmsType of Formula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie A MennellaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA. mennella@monell.org
Laura D Lukasewycz
Sara M Castor
Gary K Beauchamp

Funding

MODEL FOR SENSITIVE PERIODS IN EARLY FLAVOR LEARNINGR01HD037119 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE · 1999 to 2016
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037119NICHD NIH HHS R01HD37119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy using the response to protein hydrolysate formula (PHF) as a model system, we discovered the existence of a sensitive period, before 4 mo, when exposure determines the hedonic tone to flavors.

objectiveWe aimed to characterize the timing and duration of this sensitive period.

designHealthy infants, whose parents had chosen formula feeding, were randomly assigned into 1 of 6 groups at age 0.5 mo: 2 control groups, one fed cow milk-based formula (CMF) and the other fed PHF for 7 mo; 2 groups fed PHF for either 1 or 3 mo beginning at 1.5 mo and CMF otherwise; and 2 groups fed PHF for 1 mo beginning at either 2.5 or 3.5 mo and CMF otherwise. Brief access taste tests were conducted monthly, and complete "meals" of both formulas occurred at the end of the study.

resultsThree months of PHF exposure led to acceptance similar to that at 1 mo of exposure. Although these infants were more accepting than were infants with no exposure, they were less accepting than were infants with 7 mo of exposure, which suggests a dosing effect. The time when flavor experiences began was also significant. Among infants exposed to PHF for 1 mo, those who were first fed PHF at 3.5 mo rejected PHF relative to CMF more than did infants exposed at younger ages.

conclusionThe general principles observed are likely of broader significance, indicating a fundamental feature of mammalian development and reflecting the importance of familiarizing infants with flavors that their mothers consume and transmit to breast milk. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00994747.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentLearningFemaleFood PreferencesHumansInfantInfant BehaviorInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornMaleProtein HydrolysatesTaste PerceptionTime FactorsProtein Hydrolysates

Identifiers

PMID21310829
PMCPMC3076653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.