Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21310686›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2011

Widely used pesticides with previously unknown endocrine activity revealed as in vitro antiandrogens.

Frances Orton, Erika Rosivatz, Martin Scholze, Andreas Kortenkamp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Personal air sampling for pesticides in the California San Joaquin Valley.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chemometric Valorization of Strawberry (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. QuantitativeEnvironmental health perspectives · 2020
    Article
  18. Agrochemicals and obesity.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Application of antagonistFood science & nutrition · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frances OrtonCentre for Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, United Kingdom. francesorton@gmail.com
Erika Rosivatz
Martin Scholze
Andreas Kortenkamp
University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that there is widespread decline in male reproductive health and that antiandrogenic pollutants may play a significant role. There is also a clear disparity between pesticide exposure and data on endocrine disruption, with most of the published literature focused on pesticides that are no longer registered for use in developed countries.

objectiveWe used estimated human exposure data to select pesticides to test for antiandrogenic activity, focusing on highest use pesticides.

methodsWe used European databases to select 134 candidate pesticides based on highest exposure, followed by a filtering step according to known or predicted receptor-mediated antiandrogenic potency, based on a previously published quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. In total, 37 pesticides were tested for in vitro androgen receptor (AR) antagonism. Of these, 14 were previously reported to be AR antagonists ("active"), 4 were predicted AR antagonists using the QSAR, 6 were predicted to not be AR antagonists ("inactive"), and 13 had unknown activity, which were "out of domain" and therefore could not be classified with the QSAR ("unknown").

resultsAll 14 pesticides with previous evidence of AR antagonism were confirmed as antiandrogenic in our assay, and 9 previously untested pesticides were identified as antiandrogenic (dimethomorph, fenhexamid, quinoxyfen, cyprodinil, λ-cyhalothrin, pyrimethanil, fludioxonil, azinphos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl). In addition, we classified 7 compounds as androgenic.

conclusionsDue to estimated antiandrogenic potency, current use, estimated exposure, and lack of previous data, we strongly recommend that dimethomorph, fludioxonil, fenhexamid, imazalil, ortho-phenylphenol, and pirimiphos-methyl be tested for antiandrogenic effects in vivo. The lack of human biomonitoring data for environmentally relevant pesticides presents a barrier to current risk assessment of pesticides on humans.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAndrogensCell Line, TumorEnvironmental MonitoringEuropeHumansMalePesticidesQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipTumor Stem Cell AssayYeastsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensPesticides

Identifiers

PMID21310686
PMCPMC3114813
OpenAlexW1994588237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.