Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21310226›Full record

ReviewHearing research2011

Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience.

Jahn N O'Neil, Catherine J Connelly, Charles J Limb, David K Ryugo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Postsynaptic FMRP Regulates SynaptogenesisThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Changes in Properties of Auditory Nerve Synapses following Conductive Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jahn N O'NeilDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Catherine J Connelly
Charles J Limb
David K Ryugo

Funding

SINGLE-CELL MARKING STUDIES OF THE AUDITORY NERVER01DC000232 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RYUGO, DAVID K. · 1989 to 2010
$6.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000232NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory experience is crucial for the normal development and maturation of brain structure and the maintenance of the auditory pathways. The specific aims of this review are (i) to provide a brief background of the synaptic morphology of the endbulb of Held in hearing and deaf animals; (ii) to argue the importance of this large synaptic ending in linking neural activity along ascending pathways to environmental acoustic events; (iii) to describe how the re-introduction of electrical activity changes this synapse; and (iv) to examine how changes at the endbulb synapse initiate trans-synaptic changes in ascending auditory projections to the superior olivary complex, the inferior complex, and the auditory cortex.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAcousticsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysBrainDeafnessDisease Models, AnimalHearingHumansInferior ColliculiOlivary NucleusSpecies SpecificitySynapsesVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID21310226
PMCPMC3116016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.