Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21308547›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2010

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing in Fungi: What is its Role in Clinical Practice?

Susanne Perkhofer, Cornelia Mrazek, Lukas Hartl, Cornelia Lass-Flörl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of a novel oxiconazole nitrate formulation: The thermosensitive gel.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne PerkhoferDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Fritz Pregl Strasse 3, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria, susanne.perkhofer@i-med.ac.at.
Cornelia Mrazek
Lukas Hartl
Cornelia Lass-Flörl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of patients are undergoing transplantation procedures or receiving aggressive immunosuppression and chemotherapy. The growing population of immunocompromised hosts has led to a rise in the prevalence of invasive fungal infections due to yeasts and molds. The introduction of new antifungal agents and recent reports of resistance emerging during treatment of fungal infections have highlighted the need for in vitro susceptibility testing. Various testing procedures have been proposed, including macrodilution and microdilution, agar diffusion, disk diffusion, and Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Establishing clinical correlation with antifungal susceptibility testing, however, is a huge challenge because susceptibility techniques do not take into account the dynamic and complex biology of fungi exposed to an antifungal in vivo. This paper reviews the available methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts and filamentous fungi and the data regarding the clinical implications of in vitro testing.

Identifiers

PMID21308547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.