Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21308515›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2010

Early antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Anand Kumar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05511129 (Tolerance and Efficacy of Amiklin Administration During Nosocomial Infections Complicating COVID-19 in the ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05511129 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Tolerance and Efficacy of Amiklin Administration During Nosocomial Infections Complicating COVID-19 in the ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,053ConditionsCOVID-19, Nosocomial Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. PScientific reports · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Optimization of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Is procalcitonin a reliable indicator of sepsis in spinal cord injury patients: an observational cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Can the cytokine adsorber CytoSorbAnnals of intensive care · 2021
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anand KumarSection of Critical Care Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, JJ399d, Health Sciences Centre, 700 William Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada, akumar61@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of modern antimicrobial therapy following the discovery of penicillin during the 1940s yielded remarkable improvements in the case fatality rates of serious infections, including septic shock. Since then, pathogens have continuously evolved under selective antimicrobial pressure, resulting in a lack of additional significant improvement in clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy of septic shock despite ever more broad-spectrum and potent drugs. In addition, although substantial effort and money were expended on the development of novel nonantimicrobial therapies of sepsis in the past 30 years, clinical progress in this regard has been limited. This article explores the possibility that the key to significant improvement in the outcome of septic shock may lie, in great part, with improvements in delivery of existing antimicrobials. Recognizing the role of delays in administration of antimicrobial therapy in the poor outcomes of septic shock is central to this effort.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.