Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21308498›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2010

Non-AIDS-Defining Malignancies in Patients with HIV in the HAART Era.

Minh Ly Nguyen, Kevin James Farrell, Clifford James Gunthel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk of Skin Cancers in Older Persons Living With HIV: A Systematic Review.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer treatment disparities in HIV-infected individuals in the United States.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minh Ly NguyenEmory University School of Medicine, 341 Ponce de Leon NE, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA, mnguye3@emory.edu.
Kevin James Farrell
Clifford James Gunthel
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has drastically changed the scope and spectrum of diseases associated with HIV, shifting from AIDS-related to non-AIDS-related diseases. Studies linking HIV/AIDS databases to cancer registries have shown a dramatic decrease in AIDS-related malignancies and a steady increase in non-AIDS-defining malignancies (NADM). We review the causes underlying the rise in incidence of NADM and the clinical presentation, pathology, and treatment outcomes of the four most commonly encountered NADM in the HAART era. Meta-analysis of published studies show an increase in NADM over the general population, mostly among infection-related cancers such as anal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, and liver cancer. Among the non-infection-related cancers, lung and skin cancers predominate. The overall effect of HAART on NADM is unsettled. As HIV-infected individuals survive longer, better screening strategies are needed to detect cancer earlier, and prospective data are needed to assess the impact of HAART on cancer outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID21308498
OpenAlexW1989554591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.