Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21308372›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011

FDG PET evaluation of early axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients.

Caroline Rousseau, Anne Devillers, Mario Campone, Loïc Campion, Ludovic Ferrer, Christine Sagan, Myriam Ricaud, Boumédiène Bridji, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer with pirarubicin versus epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and docetaxel.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Novel applications of molecular imaging to guide breast cancer therapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Value ofEJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Subtype-GuidedThe oncologist · 2020
    Article
  15. Additional value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center René Gauducheau, IRCNA, Saint Herblain, France. c-rousseau@nantes.fnclcc.fr
Anne Devillers
Mario Campone
Loïc Campion
Ludovic Ferrer
Christine Sagan
Myriam Ricaud
Boumédiène Bridji
Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRegional axillary lymph node status has remained the single most independent variable to predict prognosis both in terms of disease recurrence and survival. This study aimed to prospectively assess sequential [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) findings as early predictors of axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients.

methodsImages were acquired with a PET/CT scanner in 52 patients after administration of FDG (5 MBq/kg) at baseline and after the first, second, third and sixth course of chemotherapy before surgery. Clinical examination and ultrasound (US) were used to assess the size of axillary nodes. Decrease in the standardized uptake value (SUV) with PET corrected or not for partial volume effects was compared to the pathological response.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of axillary node staging was higher with PET (75, 87 and 80%) than with US (50, 83 and 65%), and even more so when PET images were corrected for partial volume effects (86, 83 and 84%). While FDG uptake did not vary much in non-responders, as confirmed by histopathological analysis, it markedly decreased to baseline levels in responders (p < 10(-5)). Fifty per cent of baseline SUV was considered the best cutoff value to distinguish responders from non-responders. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy of FDG PET after one course of chemotherapy were, respectively, 96, 75, 95 and 84%.

conclusionThe pathological status of regional axillary lymph nodes in stage II and III breast cancer patients could be accurately predicted after one course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on FDG PET images.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Neoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedBiological TransportBreast NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.