Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21307389›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2011

Residential treatment compared with outpatient treatment for tobacco use and dependence.

J Taylor Hays, Ivana T Croghan, Darrell R Schroeder, Michael V Burke, Jon O Ebbert, David D McFadden, Richard D Hurt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of National Residential Smoking Cessation Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Underlying reasons for smoking.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2011
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J Taylor HaysNicotine Dependence Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. hays.taylor@mayo.edu
Ivana T Croghan
Darrell R Schroeder
Michael V Burke
Jon O Ebbert
David D McFadden
Richard D Hurt
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of outpatient vs residential treatment for tobacco dependence in a large referral practice. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed data from 2 cohorts of cigarette smokers who received either comprehensive outpatient or intensive 8-day residential treatment for tobacco dependence between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence from smoking at 6 months was obtained via telephone interview. Logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of increased abstinence with residential treatment.

resultsOverall, 4327 cigarette smokers received comprehensive outpatient treatment for tobacco dependence, and 226 smokers received treatment in an intensive 8-day residential program. Compared with outpatients, residential patients smoked more cigarettes per day (mean ± SD, 31.1 ± 14.4 vs 21.2 ± 11.2), had more severe nicotine dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score, 6.9 ± 2.0 vs 5.1 ± 2.3), and were more likely to have been treated for alcoholism (58/222 [26%] vs 649/4327 [15%]) or depression (124/222 [56%] vs 1817/4327 [42%]; P<.001 for all comparisons). The 6-month smoking abstinence rate was significantly higher for residential patients compared with outpatients (115/222 [52%] vs 1168/4327 [27%]; unadjusted odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.9), with similar findings after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 3.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-4.9).

conclusionCompared with smokers who received outpatient treatment, those who received residential treatment had more severe tobacco dependence. Residential treatment for tobacco dependence was associated with a significantly greater odds of 6-month smoking abstinence compared with outpatient treatment among smokers in a referral clinic setting.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareResidential TreatmentSmoking CessationAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersTobacco Use DisorderTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21307389
PMCPMC3046940
OpenAlexW1963964896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.