Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21307152›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2011

Performance of the Focus HerpeSelect-2 enzyme immunoassay for the detection of herpes simplex virus type 2 antibodies in seven African countries.

Andrew Mujugira, Rhoda Ashley Morrow, Connie Celum, Jairam Lingappa, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, Kenneth H Fife, Renee Heffron, Guy De Bruyn, Brigitte Homawoo, Etienne Karita and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew MujugiraDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. mujugira@uw.edu
Rhoda Ashley Morrow
Connie Celum
Jairam Lingappa
Sinead Delany-Moretlwe
Kenneth H Fife
Renee Heffron
Guy De Bruyn
Brigitte Homawoo
Etienne Karita
Nelly Mugo
Bellington Vwalika
Jared M Baeten
Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission Study Team
University of Washington · USRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group · RWIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNational Clinical Research · USPerinatal HIV Research Unit · ZAUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

THE PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS OF ASYMPTOMATIC GENITAL HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUSP01AI030731 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHU, JIA · 1991 to 2017
$34.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI030731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the performance of the Focus HerpeSelect-2 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the gold standard herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2 western blot, among HIV-1-uninfected men and women in east and southern Africa.

methods3399 HIV-1-uninfected women and men from seven countries in east and southern Africa were tested for HSV-2 antibody using the Focus HerpeSelect-2 EIA. The performance of the HerpesSelect-2 EIA was compared with the gold standard HSV-2-specific western blot.

resultsTwo-thirds (2294/3399) of participants were male and two-thirds (2242/3399) were from east Africa. By western blot testing, HSV-2 prevalence was 68%; 59% in men and 85% in women. At the manufacturer's recommended cut-off value of greater than 1.1, the HerpeSelect-2 EIA had a sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 80.3%. Receiver operating characteristic plot analysis indicated that the optimum cut-off was 2.1 or greater, with sensitivity 93.9% and specificity 90.5%. Diagnostic accuracy was modestly higher for southern Africa (area under the curve (AUC) 0.979, 95% CI 0.970 to 0.988) compared with east Africa (AUC 0.954, 95% CI 0.942 to 0.965; p<0.001 for southern vs east Africa).

conclusionsThe Focus HerpeSelect-2 EIA has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the determination of HSV-2 serostatus in African HIV-1-uninfected adults. An assay cut-off value of 2.1 or greater results in approximately 90% sensitivity and specificity, against a gold standard HSV-2 western blot. Diagnostic accuracy differed slightly by geographical region.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica South of the SaharaAgedAntibodies, ViralBlotting, WesternFeasibility StudiesFemaleHerpes GenitalisHerpesvirus 2, HumanHIV InfectionsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID21307152
PMCPMC3066402
OpenAlexW2108844503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.