ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2011
Fenofibrate administration does not affect muscle triglyceride concentration or insulin sensitivity in humans.
Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Inflexibility with Obesity and the Effects of Fenofibrate on Skeletal Muscle Fatty Acid Oxidation.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2017Trial
- Beneficial Effect of Fenofibrate in Combination with Silymarin on Parameters of Hereditary Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Disorders in an Animal Model of Metabolic Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Research trends in lipid-lowering therapies for coronary heart disease combined with hyperlipidemia: a bibliometric study and visual analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Novel Selective PPARα Modulator Pemafibrate for Dyslipidemia, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), and Atherosclerosis.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Novel therapies with precision mechanisms for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021Review
- Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulators (SPPARMα): New Opportunities to Reduce Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- Pemafibrate, a New Selective PPARα Modulator: Drug Concept and Its Clinical Applications for Dyslipidemia and Metabolic Diseases.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- Pemafibrate (K-877), a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator for management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2017Review
- Modulation Effect of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Agonists on Lipid Droplet Proteins in Liver.Journal of diabetes research · 2016Article
- Integrated physiology and systems biology of PPARα.Molecular metabolism · 2014Review
- Cardiometabolic impact of non-statin lipid lowering therapies.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2014Review
- Effect of hypolipidemic treatment on glycemic profile in patients with mixed dyslipidemia.World journal of diabetes · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animal data suggest that males, in particular, rely on peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α activity to maintain normal muscle triglyceride metabolism. We sought to examine whether this was also true in men vs women and its relationship to insulin sensitivity (Si). Normolipidemic obese men (n = 9) and women (n = 9) underwent an assessment of Si (intravenous glucose tolerance test) and intramuscular triglyceride (IMTG) metabolism (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry from plasma and muscle biopsies taken after infusion of [U-(13)C]palmitate) before and after 12 weeks of fenofibrate treatment. Women were more insulin sensitive (Si: 5.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.4 ± 0.4 ×10(-4)/ μU/mL, W vs M, P < .01) at baseline despite similar IMTG concentration (41.9 ± 15.5 vs 30.8 ± 5.1 μg/mg dry weight, W vs M, P = .43) and IMTG fractional synthesis rate (FSR) (0.27%/h ± 0.07%/h vs 0.35%/h ± 0.06%/h, W vs M, P = .41) as men. Fenofibrate enhanced FSR in men (0.35 ± 0.06 to 0.54 ± 0.06, P = .05), with no such change seen in women (0.27 ± 0.07 to 0.32 ± 0.13, P = .73) and no change in IMTG concentration in either group (23.0 ± 3.9 in M, P = .26 vs baseline; 36.3 ± 12.0 in W, P = .79 vs baseline). Insulin sensitivity was unaffected by fenofibrate (P ≥ .68). Lower percentage saturation of IMTG in women vs men before (29.1% ± 2.3% vs 35.2% ± 1.7%, P = .06) and after (27.3% ± 2.8% vs 35.1% ± 1.9%, P = .04) fenofibrate most closely related to their greater Si (R(2) = 0.34, P = .10) and was largely unchanged by the drug. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α agonist therapy had little effect on IMTG metabolism in men or women. Intramuscular triglyceride saturation, rather than IMTG concentration or FSR, most closely (but not significantly) related to Si and was unchanged by fenofibrate administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.