Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21306746›Full record

ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2011

Fenofibrate administration does not affect muscle triglyceride concentration or insulin sensitivity in humans.

Leigh Perreault, Bryan C Bergman, Devon M Hunerdosse, David J Howard, Robert H Eckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metabolic Inflexibility with Obesity and the Effects of Fenofibrate on Skeletal Muscle Fatty Acid Oxidation.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leigh PerreaultDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. leigh.perreault@ucdenver.edu
Bryan C Bergman
Devon M Hunerdosse
David J Howard
Robert H Eckel
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

YOGA FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HIV-METABOLIC SYNDROMESM01RR000036 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NEWCOMER, JOHN W. · 1985 to 2007
$25.4M
Intramuscular Triglyceride in Impaired Glucose ToleranceK23DK064811 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PERREAULT, LEIGH · 2004 to 2008
$791k
Fasting, Insulin Action &Post-prandial metabolismF32DK059739 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BERGMAN, BRYAN C · 2001 to 2002
$86k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000036NCRR NIH HHS RR-0036NIDDK NIH HHS DK-059739NIDDK NIH HHS DK-064811NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK059739NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK064811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal data suggest that males, in particular, rely on peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α activity to maintain normal muscle triglyceride metabolism. We sought to examine whether this was also true in men vs women and its relationship to insulin sensitivity (Si). Normolipidemic obese men (n = 9) and women (n = 9) underwent an assessment of Si (intravenous glucose tolerance test) and intramuscular triglyceride (IMTG) metabolism (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry from plasma and muscle biopsies taken after infusion of [U-(13)C]palmitate) before and after 12 weeks of fenofibrate treatment. Women were more insulin sensitive (Si: 5.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.4 ± 0.4 ×10(-4)/ μU/mL, W vs M, P < .01) at baseline despite similar IMTG concentration (41.9 ± 15.5 vs 30.8 ± 5.1 μg/mg dry weight, W vs M, P = .43) and IMTG fractional synthesis rate (FSR) (0.27%/h ± 0.07%/h vs 0.35%/h ± 0.06%/h, W vs M, P = .41) as men. Fenofibrate enhanced FSR in men (0.35 ± 0.06 to 0.54 ± 0.06, P = .05), with no such change seen in women (0.27 ± 0.07 to 0.32 ± 0.13, P = .73) and no change in IMTG concentration in either group (23.0 ± 3.9 in M, P = .26 vs baseline; 36.3 ± 12.0 in W, P = .79 vs baseline). Insulin sensitivity was unaffected by fenofibrate (P ≥ .68). Lower percentage saturation of IMTG in women vs men before (29.1% ± 2.3% vs 35.2% ± 1.7%, P = .06) and after (27.3% ± 2.8% vs 35.1% ± 1.9%, P = .04) fenofibrate most closely related to their greater Si (R(2) = 0.34, P = .10) and was largely unchanged by the drug. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α agonist therapy had little effect on IMTG metabolism in men or women. Intramuscular triglyceride saturation, rather than IMTG concentration or FSR, most closely (but not significantly) related to Si and was unchanged by fenofibrate administration.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseBody CompositionFemaleFenofibrateGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHypolipidemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalOverweightTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseFenofibrateHypolipidemic AgentsInsulinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID21306746
PMCPMC3135750
OpenAlexW1972538440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.