ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2011
Using the full spectral capacity (six channels) of a real-time PCR instrument can simplify diagnostic laboratory screening and typing protocols for pandemic H1N1 influenza.
Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of nasopharyngeal innate defenses by viral coinfection predisposes individuals to experimental pneumococcal carriage.Mucosal immunology · 2016Trial
- An Influenza A Vaccine Based on the Extracellular Domain of Matrix 2 Protein Protects BALB/C Mice Against H1N1 and H3N2.Vaccines · 2019Article
- A newly developed tetraplex real-time RT-PCR for simultaneous screening of influenza virus types A, B, C and D.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2019Article
- The impact of the H1N1 influenza pandemic on clinical presentations and viral epidemiology of acute respiratory infection in preschool children in Brazil.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2012Article
- Viral and atypical bacterial detection in acute respiratory infection in children under five years.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely reporting of influenza A virus subtype affects patient management. Real-time PCR is a rapid and sensitive method routinely used to characterise viral nucleic acid, but the full spectral capability of the instruments is not employed.
objectivesTo evaluate a hexaplex real-time PCR assay (Flu-6plx assay) capable of detecting influenza A and B, hMPV, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and distinguishing 2008 'human' influenza A/H1 from 2009 pandemic A/H1 subtypes.
methodsRespiratory specimens (n = 213) were tested using the Flu-6plx assay and a further four monoplex PCRs targeting hMPV, RSV, influenza A and B. The FDA-approved ProFlu ST test was used to validate the Flu-6plx PCR influenza A/H1 subtyping components. Discrepant 2009 pandemic A/H1 results were further tested using the CDC swine H1 assay. Results The Flu-6plx assay had excellent sensitivity identifying 106/106 influenza A RNA-positive samples. The ProFlu ST test was a less sensitive subtyping test, and discrepant analysis could not confirm A/H1 status for four samples resulting in Flu-6plx PCR specificities of 98% and 95% for human A/H1 and 2009 pandemic A/H1, respectively. Co-infection affected the sensitivity of the Flu-6plx PCR hMPV component whereby low-level hMPV RNA could be masked by much higher concentrations of influenza A virus RNA.
conclusionsThe Flu-6plx assay is a sensitive and specific test for the universal detection of influenza A infection and determination of A/H1 subtype. Concomitant detection of influenza B, hMPV and RSV demonstrates the utility of hexaplex real-time PCRs in viral diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.