Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21305668›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2011

Identification of human gustatory cortex by activation likelihood estimation.

Maria G Veldhuizen, Jessica Albrecht, Christina Zelano, Sanne Boesveldt, Paul Breslin, Johan N Lundström

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria G VeldhuizenAffective Sensory Neuroscience, John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jessica Albrecht
Christina Zelano
Sanne Boesveldt
Paul Breslin
Johan N Lundström
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USKarolinska Institutet · SENorthwestern University · US

Funding

Human Umami Taste: Genetics of Psychophysical TraitsR01DC002995 · NIDCD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BRESLIN, PAUL A. S · 2002 to 2012
$4.2M
Odor Processing: Differences Determined by Origin of OdorantsR03DC009869 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI LUNDSTROM, JOHAN N · 2009 to 2011
$444k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002995NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC009869NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC009869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, neuroimaging methods have identified a variety of taste-responsive brain regions. Their precise location, however, remains in dispute. For example, taste stimulation activates areas throughout the insula and overlying operculum, but identification of subregions has been inconsistent. Furthermore, literature reviews and summaries of gustatory brain activations tend to reiterate rather than resolve this ambiguity. Here, we used a new meta-analytic method [activation likelihood estimation (ALE)] to obtain a probability map of the location of gustatory brain activation across 15 studies. The map of activation likelihood values can also serve as a source of independent coordinates for future region-of-interest analyses. We observed significant cortical activation probabilities in: bilateral anterior insula and overlying frontal operculum, bilateral mid dorsal insula and overlying Rolandic operculum, and bilateral posterior insula/parietal operculum/postcentral gyrus, left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), right medial OFC, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (prACC) and right mediodorsal thalamus. This analysis confirms the involvement of multiple cortical areas within insula and overlying operculum in gustatory processing and provides a functional "taste map" which can be used as an inclusive mask in the data analyses of future studies. In light of this new analysis, we discuss human central processing of gustatory stimuli and identify topics where increased research effort is warranted.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCerebral CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTaste Perception

Identifiers

PMID21305668
PMCPMC3123671
OpenAlexW2017750442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.