Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21305507›Full record

ArticleArthritis and rheumatism2011

Low frequency of primary lipid screening among medicare patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Christie M Bartels, Amy J H Kind, Christine Everett, Matthew Mell, Patrick McBride, Maureen Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardio-rheumatology: it's time to collaborate.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christie M BartelsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison. cb4@medicine.wisc.edu.
Amy J H Kind
Christine Everett
Matthew Mell
Patrick McBride
Maureen Smith

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1-RR-025011NCRR NIH HHS 5KL2-RR-025012-02NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough studies have demonstrated suboptimal preventive care in RA patients, performance of primary lipid screening (i.e., testing before cardiovascular disease [CVD], CVD risk equivalents, or hyperlipidemia is evident) has not been systematically examined. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between primary lipid screening and visits to primary care providers (PCPs) and rheumatologists among a national sample of older RA patients.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined a 5% Medicare sample that included 3,298 RA patients without baseline CVD, diabetes mellitus, or hyperlipidemia, who were considered eligible for primary lipid screening during the years 2004-2006. The outcome was probability of lipid screening by the relative frequency of primary care and rheumatology visits, or seeing a PCP at least once each year.

resultsPrimary lipid screening was performed in only 45% of RA patients. Overall, 65% of patients received both primary and rheumatology care, and 50% saw a rheumatologist as often as a PCP. Any primary care predicted more lipid screening than lone rheumatology care (26% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 21-32]). As long as a PCP was involved, performance of lipid screening was similar regardless of the balance between primary and rheumatology visits (44-48% [95% CI 41-51]). Not seeing a PCP at least annually decreased screening by 22% (adjusted risk ratio 0.78 [95% CI 0.71-0.84]).

conclusionPrimary lipid screening was performed in fewer than half of eligible RA patients, highlighting a key target for CVD risk reduction efforts. Annual visits to a PCP improved lipid screening, although performance remained poor (51%). Half of RA patients saw their rheumatologist as often or more often than they saw a PCP, illustrating the need to study optimal partnerships between PCPs and rheumatologists for screening patients for CVD risks.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansLipidsMaleMass ScreeningMedicareRetrospective StudiesRheumatologyUnited StatesLipids

Identifiers

PMID21305507
PMCPMC3086993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.