Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21305381›Full record

ReviewPediatric surgery international2011

Febrile urinary tract infection, vesicoureteral reflux, and renal scarring: current controversies in approach to evaluation.

Martin A Koyle, Jack S Elder, Steven J Skoog, Tej K Mattoo, Hans G Pohl, Pramod P Reddy, Jennifer M Abidari, Warren T Snodgrass

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can postpyelonephritic renal scarring be prevented?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Brazilian consensus on vesicoureteral reflux-recommendations for clinical practice.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  14. The role of voiding cystourethrography in the investigation of children with urinary tract infections.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin A KoyleMichael Mitchell Endowed Chair in Pediatric Urology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. martin.koyle@seattlechildrens.org
Jack S Elder
Steven J Skoog
Tej K Mattoo
Hans G Pohl
Pramod P Reddy
Jennifer M Abidari
Warren T Snodgrass

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideal approach to the radiological evaluation of children with urinary tract infection (UTI) is in a state of confusion. The conventional bottom-up approach, with its focus on the detection of upper and lower urinary tract abnormalities, including vesicoureteral reflux, has been challenged by the top-down approach, which focuses on confirming the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis before more invasive imaging is considered. Controversies abound regarding which approach may best assess the ultimate risk for reflux-related renal scarring. Evolving practices motivated by the emerging evidence, the desire to minimize unnecessary interventions, as well as improve compliance with recommended testing, have added to the current controversies. Recent guideline updates and ongoing clinical trials hopefully will help in addressing some of these concerns.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAcute DiseaseAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCicatrixFemaleFeverHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPyelonephritisUrinary Tract InfectionsVesico-Ureteral Reflux

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.