ArticleNeuroinformatics2011
Models and simulation of 3D neuronal dendritic trees using Bayesian networks.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- NeuroSuites: An online platform for running neuroscience, statistical, and machine learning tools.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Efficient metadata mining of web-accessible neural morphologies.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Comparing the Electrophysiology and Morphology of Human and Mouse Layer 2/3 Pyramidal Neurons With Bayesian Networks.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Comparing basal dendrite branches in human and mouse hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons with Bayesian networks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- NeuroPath2Path: Classification and elastic morphing between neuronal arbors using path-wise similarity.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- An open repository for single-cell reconstructions of the brain forest.Scientific data · 2018Article
- Tree Topology Estimation.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2015Article
- Branching angles of pyramidal cell dendrites follow common geometrical design principles in different cortical areas.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Bayesian networks in neuroscience: a survey.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Review
- Review
- New insights into the classification and nomenclature of cortical GABAergic interneurons.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2013Review
- Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuron morphology is crucial for neuronal connectivity and brain information processing. Computational models are important tools for studying dendritic morphology and its role in brain function. We applied a class of probabilistic graphical models called Bayesian networks to generate virtual dendrites from layer III pyramidal neurons from three different regions of the neocortex of the mouse. A set of 41 morphological variables were measured from the 3D reconstructions of real dendrites and their probability distributions used in a machine learning algorithm to induce the model from the data. A simulation algorithm is also proposed to obtain new dendrites by sampling values from Bayesian networks. The main advantage of this approach is that it takes into account and automatically locates the relationships between variables in the data instead of using predefined dependencies. Therefore, the methodology can be applied to any neuronal class while at the same time exploiting class-specific properties. Also, a Bayesian network was defined for each part of the dendrite, allowing the relationships to change in the different sections and to model heterogeneous developmental factors or spatial influences. Several univariate statistical tests and a novel multivariate test based on Kullback-Leibler divergence estimation confirmed that virtual dendrites were similar to real ones. The analyses of the models showed relationships that conform to current neuroanatomical knowledge and support model correctness. At the same time, studying the relationships in the models can help to identify new interactions between variables related to dendritic morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21305364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.