Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21304707›Full record

ArticleStandards in genomic sciences2010

The JCVI standard operating procedure for annotating prokaryotic metagenomic shotgun sequencing data.

David M Tanenbaum, Johannes Goll, Sean Murphy, Prateek Kumar, Nikhat Zafar, Mathangi Thiagarajan, Ramana Madupu, Tanja Davidsen, Leonid Kagan, Saul Kravitz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Standards in genomic sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring antibiotic resistance in environmental integron-cassettes through intI-attC amplicons deep sequencing.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David M Tanenbaum
Johannes Goll
Sean Murphy
Prateek Kumar
Nikhat Zafar
Mathangi Thiagarajan
Ramana Madupu
Tanja Davidsen
Leonid Kagan
Saul Kravitz
Douglas B Rusch
Shibu Yooseph

Funding

Construction Of A Reference Sequence Data Set For The Human Microbiome ProjectU54AI084844 · NIAID · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI NELSON, KAREN E. · 2009 to 2012
$10.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI084844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The JCVI metagenomics analysis pipeline provides for the efficient and consistent annotation of shotgun metagenomics sequencing data for sampling communities of prokaryotic organisms. The process can be equally applied to individual sequence reads from traditional Sanger capillary electrophoresis sequences, newer technologies such as 454 pyrosequencing, or sequence assemblies derived from one or more of these data types. It includes the analysis of both coding and non-coding genes, whether full-length or, as is often the case for shotgun metagenomics, fragmentary. The system is designed to provide the best-supported conservative functional annotation based on a combination of trusted homology-based scientific evidence and computational assertions and an annotation value hierarchy established through extensive manual curation. The functional annotation attributes assigned by this system include gene name, gene symbol, GO terms, EC numbers, and JCVI functional role categories.

Indexed as

environmental sequencingfunctional annotationGlobal Ocean SamplingJ. Craig Venter Instituteprokaryotic shotgun metagenomicsSargasso Sea

Identifiers

PMID21304707
PMCPMC3035284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.