Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21304549›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2011

Protein scaffolds in the coupling of synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis.

Volker Haucke, Erwin Neher, Stephan J Sigrist

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Principles ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Impact of Elovl5 Deficiency on Cerebellar Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Volker HauckeDepartment of Membrane Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität, and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Takustraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany. volker.haucke@fu‑berlin.de
Erwin Neher
Stephan J Sigrist

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms that ensure robust long-term performance of synaptic transmission over a wide range of activity are crucial for the integrity of neuronal networks, for processing sensory information and for the ability to learn and store memories. Recent experiments have revealed that such robust performance requires a tight coupling between exocytic vesicle fusion at defined release sites and endocytic retrieval of synaptic vesicle membranes. Distinct presynaptic scaffolding proteins are essential for fulfilling this requirement, providing either ultrastructural coordination or acting as signalling hubs.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndocytosisExocytosisHumansMatrix Attachment RegionsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionSynaptic Vesicles

Identifiers

PMID21304549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.