Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21304547›Full record

ArticleHeredity2011

The genetic basis of divergent pigment patterns in juvenile threespine sticklebacks.

A K Greenwood, F C Jones, Y F Chan, S D Brady, D M Absher, J Grimwood, J Schmutz, R M Myers, D M Kingsley, C L Peichel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dark-rearing uncovers novel gene expression patterns in an obligate cave-dwelling fish.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The genetic and molecular architecture of phenotypic diversity in sticklebacks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A K GreenwoodDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. akg@stanfordalumni.org
F C Jones
Y F Chan
S D Brady
D M Absher
J Grimwood
J Schmutz
R M Myers
D M Kingsley
C L Peichel

Funding

Genomic Basis of Vertebrate DiversityP50HG002568 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 2002 to 2011
$29.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal pigment patterns are important for a range of functions, including camouflage and communication. Repeating pigment patterns, such as stripes, bars and spots have been of particular interest to developmental and theoretical biologists, but the genetic basis of natural variation in such patterns is largely unexplored. In this study, we identify a difference in a periodic pigment pattern among juvenile threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from different environments. Freshwater sticklebacks exhibit prominent vertical bars that visually break up the body shape, but sticklebacks from marine populations do not. We hypothesize that these distinct pigment patterns are tuned to provide crypsis in different habitats. This phenotypic difference is widespread and appears in most of the freshwater populations that we sampled. We used quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping in freshwater-marine F2 hybrids to elucidate the genetic architecture underlying divergence in this pigmentation pattern. We identified two QTL that were significantly associated with variation in barring. Interestingly, these QTL were associated with two distinct aspects of the pigment pattern: melanophore number and overall pigment level. We compared the QTL locations with positions of known pigment candidate genes in the stickleback genome. We also identified two major QTL for juvenile body size, providing new insights into the genetic basis of juvenile growth rates in natural populations. In summary, although there is a growing literature describing simple genetic bases for adaptive coloration differences, this study emphasizes that pigment patterns can also possess a more complex genetic architecture.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAllelesAnimalsBody SizeChromosome MappingFemaleMalePigmentationPigments, BiologicalQuantitative Trait LociSmegmamorphaPigments, Biological

Identifiers

PMID21304547
PMCPMC3136628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.