Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21304053›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2011

Th17 cells in cancer: help or hindrance?

Cailin Moira Wilke, Ilona Kryczek, Shuang Wei, Ende Zhao, Ke Wu, Guobin Wang, Weiping Zou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A new combined prognostic model involvingTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. T cells in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identification ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cailin Moira WilkeDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ilona Kryczek
Shuang Wei
Ende Zhao
Ke Wu
Guobin Wang
Weiping Zou
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of CD4+ T helper (Th) 17 cells in malignancy is currently under debate. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes apparent that this discussion includes not only evaluations of Th17 cells but also IL-17+ cells from other immune populations, the cytokine interleukin (IL)-17 itself (both endogenous and exogenous) and IL-23. Further complicating the matter are occasionally conflicting results of studies in humans versus those in mice and contradictory data from immunocompetent versus immunodeficient mice. To better understand the role of Th17 cells in the tumor-bearing host, we focus first upon those studies investigating Th17 cells in patients and then those in mice, all the while keeping in mind that variables such as tumor-initiating agents, a pre-existing inflammatory environment and the immune competence of the host may have direct effects upon this T-cell subset. In this review, we will describe the phenotype of tumor-associated Th17 cells, review those studies that have examined the population directly, and finally, briefly discuss the studies involving Th17-associated signature cytokines.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesHumansMiceNeoplasmsTh17 CellsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID21304053
PMCPMC3086699
OpenAlexW2116378201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.