Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21303844›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2011

Elaborating polarity: PAR proteins and the cytoskeleton.

Jeremy Nance, Jennifer A Zallen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mllt11 Regulates Migration and Neurite Outgrowth of Cortical Projection Neurons during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy NanceHelen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. jeremy.nance@med.nyu.edu
Jennifer A Zallen
Kettering University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Molecular control of tissue morphogenesisR01GM079340 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ZALLEN, JENNIFER A · 2007 to 2021
$4.2M
Mechanisms of Contact-Mediated Cell Polarization in the C. elegans Embryo.R01GM078341 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NANCE, JEREMY · 2007 to 2015
$3.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078341NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell polarity is essential for cells to divide asymmetrically, form spatially restricted subcellular structures and participate in three-dimensional multicellular organization. PAR proteins are conserved polarity regulators that function by generating cortical landmarks that establish dynamic asymmetries in the distribution of effector proteins. Here, we review recent findings on the role of PAR proteins in cell polarity in C. elegans and Drosophila, and emphasize the links that exist between PAR networks and cytoskeletal proteins that both regulate PAR protein localization and act as downstream effectors to elaborate polarity within the cell.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCytoskeletal ProteinsCytoskeletonDrosophilaReceptors, Proteinase-ActivatedCytoskeletal ProteinsReceptors, Proteinase-Activated

Identifiers

PMID21303844
PMCPMC3035085
OpenAlexW1984163925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.