Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21303803›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2011

Hierarchical latency models for dose-time-response associations.

David B Richardson, Richard F MacLehose, Bryan Langholz, Stephen R Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Multivariate Dynamic Spatial Factor Model for Speciated Pollutants and Adverse Birth Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Glucocorticoid prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  8. Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists.International journal of epidemiology · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David B RichardsonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA. david.richardson@unc.edu
Richard F MacLehose
Bryan Langholz
Stephen R Cole

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Cohort analysis methods for occupational cancer studiesR01CA117841 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID B · 2007 to 2012
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA117841NCI NIH HHS R01-CA117841NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure lagging and exposure-time window analysis are 2 widely used approaches to allow for induction and latency periods in analyses of exposure-disease associations. Exposure lagging implies a strong parametric assumption about the temporal evolution of the exposure-disease association. An exposure-time window analysis allows for a more flexible description of temporal variation in exposure effects but may result in unstable risk estimates that are sensitive to how windows are defined. The authors describe a hierarchical regression approach that combines time window analysis with a parametric latency model. They illustrate this approach using data from 2 occupational cohort studies: studies of lung cancer mortality among 1) asbestos textile workers and 2) uranium miners. For each cohort, an exposure-time window analysis was compared with a hierarchical regression analysis with shrinkage toward a simpler, second-stage parametric latency model. In each cohort analysis, there is substantial stability gained in time window-specific estimates of association by using a hierarchical regression approach. The proposed hierarchical regression model couples a time window analysis with a parametric latency model; this approach provides a way to stabilize risk estimates derived from a time window analysis and a way to reduce bias arising from misspecification of a parametric latency model.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugModels, StatisticalAsbestosHumansLung NeoplasmsMiningModels, TheoreticalOccupational ExposureRadonRegression AnalysisRisk AssessmentTextile IndustryTime FactorsUraniumAsbestosRadonUranium

Identifiers

PMID21303803
PMCPMC3105259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.