Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21302955›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2011

Structures of β-hairpin antimicrobial protegrin peptides in lipopolysaccharide membranes: mechanism of gram selectivity obtained from solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance.

Yongchao Su, Alan J Waring, Piotr Ruchala, Mei Hong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Protegrin-1 and Analogues AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Structure determination of a membrane protein in proteoliposomes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yongchao SuDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States.
Alan J Waring
Piotr Ruchala
Mei Hong
Iowa State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Structures and lipid interactions of curvature-inducing membrane peptides by NMRR01GM066976 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HONG, MEI · 2003 to 2021
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066976NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural basis for the gram selectivity of two disulfide-bonded β-hairpin antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is investigated using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The hexa-arginine PG-1 exhibits potent activities against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, while a mutant of PG-1 with only three cationic residues maintains gram-positive activity but is 30-fold less active against gram-negative bacteria. We determined the topological structure and lipid interactions of these two peptides in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-rich membrane that mimics the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria and in the POPE/POPG membrane, which mimics the membrane of gram-positive bacteria. (31)P NMR line shapes indicate that both peptides cause less orientational disorder in the LPS-rich membrane than in the POPE/POPG membrane. (13)C chemical shifts and (13)C-(1)H dipolar couplings show that both peptides maintain their β-hairpin conformation in these membranes and are largely immobilized, but the mutant exhibits noticeable intermediate-time scale motion in the LPS membrane at physiological temperature, suggesting shallow insertion. Indeed, (1)H spin diffusion from lipid chains to the peptides shows that PG-1 fully inserts into the LPS-rich membrane whereas the mutant does not. The (13)C-(31)P distances between the most hydrophobically embedded Arg of PG-1 and the lipid (31)P are significantly longer in the LPS membrane than in the POPE/POPG membrane, indicating that PG-1 does not cause toroidal pore defects in the LPS membrane, in contrast to its behavior in the POPE/POPG membrane. Taken together, these data indicate that PG-1 causes transmembrane pores of the barrel-stave type in the LPS membrane, thus allowing further translocation of the peptide into the inner membrane of gram-negative bacteria to kill the cells. In comparison, the less cationic mutant cannot fully cross the LPS membrane because of weaker electrostatic attractions, thus causing weaker antimicrobial activities. Therefore, strong electrostatic attraction between the peptide and the membrane surface, ensured by having a sufficient number of Arg residues, is essential for potent antimicrobial activities against gram-negative bacteria. The data provide a rational basis for controlling gram selectivity of AMPs by adjusting the charge densities.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularAmino Acid SequenceAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomimeticsCell MembraneGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaGuanidineLipopolysaccharidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein Structure, SecondarySpecies SpecificityAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesGuanidineLipopolysaccharidesprotegrin-1

Identifiers

PMID21302955
PMCPMC3062705
OpenAlexW1993674860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.