ArticleDemography2010
Recent developments in longitudinal studies of aging in the United States.
Article in Demography, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congressional Symmetry: Years Remaining Mirror Years Served in the U.S. House and Senate.Genus · 2023Article
- Latent profile analysis of dietary intake in a community-dwelling sample of older Americans.Public health nutrition · 2020Article
- Latent Profiles of Macronutrient Density and their Association with Mobility Limitations in an Observational Longitudinal Study of Older U.S. Adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2018Observational
- WEALTH INEQUALITY AND ACCUMULATION.Annual review of sociology · 2017Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in smoking changes after chronic disease diagnosis among middle-aged and older adults in the United States.BMC geriatrics · 2017Article
- Forecasting Trends in Disability in a Super-Aging Society: Adapting the Future Elderly Model to Japan.Journal of the economics of ageing · 2016Article
- Estimating the Co-Development of Cognitive Decline and Physical Mobility Limitations in Older U.S. Adults.Demography · 2016Article
- Why do older people change their ratings of childhood health?Demography · 2014Article
- History of alcohol use disorders and risk of severe cognitive impairment: a 19-year prospective cohort study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2014Article
- New strategies for biosample collection in population-based social research.Social science research · 2013Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in hypertension risk: new diagnoses after age 50.Ethnicity & disease · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We review recent developments in longitudinal studies of aging, focusing on the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Both studies are part of a trend toward biosocial surveys in which biological measurement is joined with traditional survey techniques, and a related trend toward greater harmonization across studies. Both studies have collected DNA samples and are working toward genotyping that would allow broadly based association studies. Increased attention to psychological measurement of personality and of cognitive ability using adaptive testing structures has also been shared across the studies. The HRS has expanded its economic measurement to longitudinal studies of consumption and to broader-based measurement of pension and Social Security wealth. It has added biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. The WLS has developed an integrated approach to the study of death and bereavement and an innovative use of high school yearbook photographs to capture information about health in early life of its participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.