ArticlePhotosynthesis research2011
Photosynthetic carbon acquisition in Sargassum henslowianum (Fucales, Phaeophyta), with special reference to the comparison between the vegetative and reproductive tissues.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of potential light deficiency response regulators in endangered species Magnolia sinostellata.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Acquisition and metabolism of carbon in the Ochrophyta other than diatoms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Photosynthetic use of inorganic carbon in deep-water kelps from the Strait of Gibraltar.Photosynthesis research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The photosynthetic oxygen evolution characteristics were examined in both vegetative (blade) and sexual reproductive (receptacle) tissues of Sargassum henslowianum (Fucales, Phaeophyta) from the Shenao bay of Nanao Island, China, to establish the mechanism of photosynthetic acquisition of inorganic carbon (Ci) in this species. In natural seawater (pH 8.1, ca. 2.2 mM Ci), irradiance-saturated net photosynthetic rate (NPR) was greater by 25.3% in blade than receptacle, whereas dark respiratory rate (DR) was 2-fold higher in receptacle than blade. NPR at pH 8.1 was nearly saturated with the 2.2 mM Ci for both blade and receptacle. However, the values of the half-saturation constant for Ci were sharply increased at pH 9.0. NPR was significantly affected, but DR was remained unchanged, with the variation of the pH values in seawater. The data from the final pH value derived from the pH-drift experiments and the comparison between the measured and theoretically estimated photosynthetic rates suggested that both blade and receptacle were capable of acquiring HCO(3)(-) in seawater. The inhibitors experiments showed that a HCO(3)(-) dehydration mechanism mediated by external carbonic anhydrase activity occurred in both the blade and receptacle tissues of S. henslowianum. The proton buffer TRIS had no inhibitory effect on NPR at normal pH value in natural seawater (pH 8.1), but it significantly depressed NPR at pH 9.0. This suggested that proton transport occurred at the outside of the plasma membrane facilitated the operation of the carbon acquisition at pH 9.0. It was proposed that the strategy of photosynthetic carbon acquisition at higher pH would prevent the alga from the damage of over-excitation and photoinhibition in case of sunshine and calm water. We concluded that the blade and receptacle tissues of S. henslowianum have similar mechanism of acquisition of exogenous Ci from seawater to drive photosynthesis; yet they are differentiated more or less with the photosynthetic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.