ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2011
Buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine findings in hair during constant maintenance dosage.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Metabolite-to-Drug Ratios of Pharmaceuticals in Hair for Forensic Investigations.Metabolites · 2021Review
- The use of nails as an alternative matrix for the long-term detection of previous drug intake: validation of sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS methods for the quantification of 76 substances and comparison of analytical results for drugs in nail and hair samples.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is still a matter of debate whether a positive correlation between the dose and the amount of drug in the hair exists. Drugs such as buprenorphine (BUP) used under controlled conditions present an opportunity to prove a possible relationship. Due to discrepant findings of BUP/norbuprenorphine (NBUP) ratios in hair, in vitro degradation of both analytes in diluted acid was also investigated. The levels of BUP and NBUP in proximal hair sections from 18 subjects participating in a maintenance program were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry following incubation with methanol and subsequent liquid/liquid extraction. BUP and NBUP were incubated in diluted hydrochloric acid at 60°C for up to 24 h. The alleged rearrangement products were simultaneously monitored. All hair samples tested positive for BUP (lower limit of detection-0.238 ng/mg hair) and NBUP (0.043-0.961 ng/mg hair). The concentration of NBUP in hair was consistently higher than that of BUP except for a single specimen. Degradation of BUP and NBUP was dependent on time; hydrolysis of NBUP occurred faster than that of BUP. The concentration of BUP and NBUP will be underestimated if analytes are recovered by acidic procedures. NBUP should be monitored in hair samples besides BUP for the sum of both BUP and NBUP may provide an estimate of BUP exposure following long-term administration of the drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.