Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21301472›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

The sociobiology of molecular systems.

Kevin R Foster

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fraternal cooperation of hierarchical cancer parallels metazoan multicellularity and eusociality.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic conflicts and the case for licensed anthropomorphizing.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The social nature of mitochondria: Implications for human health.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  7. Modes of Communication between T Cells and Relevance for Immune Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Inclusive fitness is an indispensable approximation for understanding organismal design.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The genetical theory of multilevel selection.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Lifecourse health development: past, present and future.Maternal and child health journal · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin R FosterDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK. kevin.foster@zoo.ox.ac.uk
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

European Research Council 242670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often assumed that molecular systems are designed to maximize the competitive ability of the organism that carries them. In reality, natural selection acts on both cooperative and competitive phenotypes, across multiple scales of biological organization. Here I ask how the potential for social effects in evolution has influenced molecular systems. I discuss a range of phenotypes, from the selfish genetic elements that disrupt genomes, through metabolism, multicellularity and cancer, to behaviour and the organization of animal societies. I argue that the balance between cooperative and competitive evolution has shaped both form and function at the molecular scale.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCompetitive BehaviorCooperative BehaviorSelection, GeneticSociobiologyAnimalsFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic VariationHumansMaleMetabolic Networks and Pathways

Identifiers

PMID21301472
OpenAlexW2053322374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.