Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21301324›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural pharmacology2011

Modest abuse-related subjective effects of zolpidem in drug-naive volunteers.

Stephanie C Licata, Yasmin Mashhoon, Robert R Maclean, Scott E Lukas

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zolpidem reduces the blood oxygen level-dependent signal during visual system stimulation.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2011
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Zolpidem: Efficacy and Side Effects for Insomnia.Health psychology research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Polysomnographic Sleep Disturbances Due to High-Dose Zolpidem Use: A Case Report.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Neural basis of benzodiazepine reward: requirement for α2 containing GABAA receptors in the nucleus accumbens.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Differential roles of GABA(A) receptor subtypes in benzodiazepine-induced enhancement of brain-stimulation reward.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie C LicataBehavioral Psychopharmacology Research Laboratory, Neuroimaging Center, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA. slicata@mclean.harvard.edu
Yasmin Mashhoon
Robert R Maclean
Scott E Lukas
Harvard University · USMcLean Hospital · US

Funding

Training In Drug Abuse and Brain ImagingT32DA015036 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI SCOTT E LUKAS · 2002 to 2026
$5.3M
PHARMACOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL INDICES OF DRUG ABUSEK05DA000343 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI LUKAS, SCOTT E · 1997 to 2008
$1.1M
fMRI Studies Investigating the Choice Effects of Sedative/HypnoticsK01DA023659 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI LICATA, STEPHANIE C · 2007 to 2010
$601k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA023659NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000343NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA015036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent case reports suggest that the short-acting benzodiazepine-like hypnotic, zolpidem, may have abuse potential among individuals who have no personal history of abusing drugs or alcohol, particularly at doses higher than those recommended for treating insomnia. This study recruited drug-naive volunteers to assess the subjective effects of multiple doses of zolpidem (0, 5, 10, or 20 mg) administered in a within-subject double-blind design. Participants (n=11) answered computerized questionnaires (Addiction Research Center Inventory, visual analog scales, and a hypothetical Drug versus Money Choice) to address the hypothesis that a supratherapeutic dose (20 mg) would increase ratings of abuse-related subjective effects, while lower therapeutic doses (5 and 10 mg) would not. Although participants rated some effects as negative at 10 and 20 mg, the highest dose engendered predominantly positive abuse-like effects such as 'High', 'Like', and 'Good Effects'. However, no dose of zolpidem was chosen over money ($0.35-$10) when participants made hypothetical choices between them. Results suggest that although individuals without a drug abuse history are not inclined to choose zolpidem when presented with an alternative reinforcer such as money, it may possess moderate abuse potential that limits its clinical utility.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMalePyridinesSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZolpidemHypnotics and SedativesPyridinesZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID21301324
PMCPMC3077937
OpenAlexW1983427480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.