ArticlePhysical biology2011
AFM stiffness nanotomography of normal, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells.
Article in Physical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atomic force microscopy-based nanomechanical signatures as cancer biomarkers in a nutshell.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Optimal design for multi-compartment cell elasticity estimation using AFM and super-resolution imaging.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Cell Mechanics in Cancer: Integrating Mechanotransduction Pathways Within the Tumor Microenvironment.Journal of cellular physiology · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Two Measurement Modalities for Ex Vivo Analysis of Corneal Stiffness in Porcine Corneas.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Concerted changes in Epithelium and Stroma: a multi-scale, multi-omics analysis of progression from Barrett's Esophagus to adenocarcinoma.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- Review
- Mechanics and disease of heart cells/cardiomyocytes explored through atomic force microscopy: present and future.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Exploring Mechanical Features of 3D Head and Neck Cancer Models.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- The mechanopathology of the tumor microenvironment: detection techniques, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence: Enabling the clinical translation of atomic force microscopy-based biomarkers for cancer diagnosis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Integrative cartilage repair using acellular allografts for engineered structure and surface lubrication in vivo.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Mechanical properties of human tumour tissues and their implications for cancer development.Nature reviews. Physics · 2024Article
- Understanding the Rhodopsin Worldview Through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM): Structure, Stability, and Activity Studies.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Article
- Pancreatic Cancer Presents Distinct Nanomechanical Properties During Progression.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Strain-dependent elastography of cancer cells reveals heterogeneity and stiffening due to attachment.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- Assessment of Efficacy of a Novel Crosslinking Protocol with Intracameral Oxygen (Bubble-CXL) in Increasing the Corneal Stiffness Using Atomic Force Microscopy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cancer cell mechanobiology: a new frontier for cancer research.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022Review
- Dynamic alteration of poroelastic attributes as determinant membrane nanorheology for endocytosis of organ specific targeted gold nanoparticles.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical stiffness of individual cells is important in tissue homeostasis, cell growth, division and motility, and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the initiation of cancer. In this work, a normal squamous cell line (EPC2) and metaplastic (CP-A) as well as dysplastic (CP-D) Barrett's Esophagus columnar cell lines are studied as a model of pre-neoplastic progression in the human esophagus. We used the combination of an atomic force microscope (AFM) with a scanning confocal fluorescence lifetime imaging microscope to study the mechanical properties of single adherent cells. Sixty four force indentation curves were taken over the nucleus of each cell in an 8 x 8 grid pattern. Analyzing the force indentation curves, indentation depth-dependent Young's moduli were found for all cell lines. Stiffness tomograms demonstrate distinct differences between the mechanical properties of the studied cell lines. Comparing the stiffness for indentation forces of 1 nN, most probable Young's moduli were calculated to 4.7 kPa for EPC2 (n = 18 cells), 3.1 kPa for CP-A (n = 10) and 2.6 kPa for CP-D (n = 19). We also tested the influence of nuclei and nucleoli staining organic dyes on the mechanical properties of the cells. For stained EPC2 cells (n = 5), significant stiffening was found (9.9 kPa), while CP-A cells (n = 5) showed no clear trend (2.9 kPa) and a slight softening was observed (2.1 kPa) in the case of CP-D cells (n = 16). Some force-indentation curves show non-monotonic discontinuities with segments of negative slope, resembling a sawtooth pattern. We found the incidence of these 'breakthrough events' to be highest in the dysplastic CP-D cells, intermediate in the metaplastic CP-A cells and lowest in the normal EPC2 cells. This observation suggests that the microscopic explanation for the increased compliance of cancerous and pre-cancerous cells may lie in their susceptibility to 'crumble and yield' rather than their ability to 'bend and flex'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.