ArticleBiotechnology journal2011
A three-dimensional in vitro ovarian cancer coculture model using a high-throughput cell patterning platform.
Article in Biotechnology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
122 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Scaffold-Based 3D Models for Decoding Cancer Biology and Advancing Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Engineering ovarian tissue via biofabrication and 3D bioprinting: Challenges and emerging perspectives.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Engineering immune-competent niches: strategies, applications, and translational hurdles in ovarian cancer organoid models.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Infertility-Related Female Reproductive System Diseases: A Review of Current and Future Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Applications and challenges of 3D printing in female reproductive system research.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Bioprinting revolution: Innovative design of 3D bioactive scaffolds for living organs and transdermal tissues.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Prospects and challenges of ovarian cancer organoids in chemotherapy research (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinting technology innovation in female reproductive system.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinted Cancer Models: Opportunities for Personalized Medicine and Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2025Review
- Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Modeling intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer.Biofabrication · 2024Review
- Targeted Cancer Therapy-on-A-Chip.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Advanced tumor organoid bioprinting strategy for oncology research.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Applications of 3D Bioprinting Technology to Brain Cells and Brain Tumor Models: Special Emphasis to Glioblastoma.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
- Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Organoids: A Prospective Advanced Model for Pancreatic Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A comprehensive review on 3D tissue models: Biofabrication technologies and preclinical applications.Biomaterials · 2024Review
- 3D Bioprinting: A Systematic Review for Future Research Direction.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Progress in bioprinting technology for tissue regeneration.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2023Review
- Review
62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro 3D cancer models that provide a more accurate representation of disease in vivo are urgently needed to improve our understanding of cancer pathology and to develop better cancer therapies. However, development of 3D models that are based on manual ejection of cells from micropipettes suffer from inherent limitations such as poor control over cell density, limited repeatability, low throughput, and, in the case of coculture models, lack of reproducible control over spatial distance between cell types (e.g., cancer and stromal cells). In this study, we build on a recently introduced 3D model in which human ovarian cancer (OVCAR-5) cells overlaid on Matrigel™ spontaneously form multicellular acini. We introduce a high-throughput automated cell printing system to bioprint a 3D coculture model using cancer cells and normal fi broblasts micropatterned on Matrigel™ . Two cell types were patterned within a spatially controlled microenvironment (e.g., cell density, cell-cell distance) in a high-throughput and reproducible manner; both cell types remained viable during printing and continued to proliferate following patterning. This approach enables the miniaturization of an established macro-scale 3D culture model and would allow systematic investigation into the multiple unknown regulatory feedback mechanisms between tumor and stromal cells and provide a tool for high-throughput drug screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.