ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2012
Screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease can reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in type 2 diabetic patients.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a novel functional tomato sauce (OsteoCol) from vine-ripened tomatoes on serum lipids in individuals with common hypercholesterolemia: tomato sauce and hypercholesterolemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Impact of microvascular complications on the outcomes of diabetic foot in type 2 diabetic patients with documented peripheral artery disease.Endocrine · 2023Article
- Association of erectile dysfunction with diabetic foot and its outcomes in type 2 diabetic men.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2023Article
- Article
- Association between clitoral tissue perfusion and female sexual dysfunction in healthy women of reproductive age: a pilot study.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- Article
- Anti-diabetic agents and heart health: how to use new diabetes medications in a global strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Erectile dysfunction as a predictor of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in elderly men with type 2 diabetes.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2016Article
- Atherogenic dyslipidemia and risk of silent coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2016Article
- Transcutaneous oxygen tension as a potential predictor of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes: comparison with ankle-brachial index.Diabetes care · 2013Article
- Review
- Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in persons with diabetes mellitus.Current diabetes reports · 2012Article
- Lipoprotein(a) and homocysteine as genetic risk factors for vascular and neuropathic diabetic foot in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Endocrine · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of the screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) on the cardiovascular prognosis in diabetes is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate whether screening for asymptomatic CAD can have an impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetes. In this nonrandomized longitudinal study, 1,189 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients without a history of CAD were evaluated. They were subdivided into two groups according to whether they were screened (screening group, n = 921) or not (no-screening group, n = 268) for asymptomatic CAD. Among the screened patients, 386 had angiographically proven CAD (CAD group) and 535 did not have silent CAD (no-CAD group). During a mean follow-up period of 4.3 ± 1.9 years, 130 patients experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The incidence of MACE was significantly greater in the no-screening than in the screening group (22.0 vs. 7.7%; p = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier method showed that: (1) the screening was associated with a lower rate of MACE (log-rank test, 3-95; p = 0.047); (2) the no-screening group had a risk profile similar to that of CAD group (log-rank test, 2.02; p = 0.154); and (3) cardiovascular prognosis was significantly better in no-CAD than in no-screening group (log-rank test, 4.27; p = 0.039). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that screening for CAD (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.2-0.3; p = 0.000) was significantly protective against the occurrence of MACE. Our data suggest that screening for asymptomatic CAD can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. This may be due to specific diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in diabetic patients with proven CAD at screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.