Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21298064›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Reshaping of bulbar odor response by nasal flow rate in the rat.

Emmanuelle Courtiol, Corine Amat, Marc Thévenet, Belkacem Messaoudi, Samuel Garcia, Nathalie Buonviso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Behavioral State-Dependent Modulation of Prefrontal Cortex Activity by Respiration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  3. Temporal Relations between Cortical Network Oscillations and Breathing Frequency during REM Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inhalation Frequency Controls Reformatting of Mitral/Tufted Cell Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Cholinergic inputs from Basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor coding in the olfactory bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Respiration drives network activity and modulates synaptic and circuit processing of lateral inhibition in the olfactory bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuelle CourtiolUniversité Lyon 1, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5020 Neurosciences Sensorielles, Comportement, Cognition, Lyon, France. ecourtiol@olfac.univ-lyon1.fr
Corine Amat
Marc Thévenet
Belkacem Messaoudi
Samuel Garcia
Nathalie Buonviso
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of respiratory dynamics on odor response has been poorly studied at the olfactory bulb level. However, it has been shown that sniffing in the behaving rodent is highly dynamic and varies both in frequency and flow rate. Bulbar odor response could vary with these sniffing parameter variations. Consequently, it is necessary to understand how nasal airflow can modify and shape odor response at the olfactory bulb level. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsTo assess this question, we used a double cannulation and simulated nasal airflow protocol on anesthetized rats to uncouple nasal airflow from animal respiration. Both mitral/tufted cell extracellular unit activity and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded. We found that airflow changes in the normal range were sufficient to substantially reorganize the response of the olfactory bulb. In particular, cellular odor-evoked activities, LFP oscillations and spike phase-locking to LFPs were strongly modified by nasal flow rate.

conclusionOur results indicate the importance of reconsidering the notion of odor coding as odor response at the bulbar level is ceaselessly modified by respiratory dynamics.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsInhalationKineticsOlfactory BulbRatsRespirationSmell

Identifiers

PMID21298064
PMCPMC3027679
OpenAlexW2043063585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.