Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21297035›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

The vulnerable developing brain.

Dino A Giussani

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Translatable in-vivo investigation of effects of progressive hypoxia in pregnancy on fetal cardiac structure and function in sheep.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Sexual stature difference fluctuations in pre- and post-Black Death London as an indicator of living standards.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dino A GiussaniDepartment of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom. dag26@cam.ac.uk

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/10/99/28656British Heart Foundation RG/06/006/22028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightBrainFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaOrgan SizePregnancyPrimatesRegional Blood Flow

Identifiers

PMID21297035
PMCPMC3041146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.