Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21296916›Full record

ReviewEukaryotic cell2011

Cell signals, cell contacts, and the organization of yeast communities.

Saul M Honigberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eukaryotic cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dimorphism ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sociobiology of the budding yeast.Journal of biosciences · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saul M HonigbergSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 66207, USA. honigbergs@umkc.edu

Funding

Mechanisms underlying pattern formation in S. cerevisiae coloniesR15GM094770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI HONIGBERG, SAUL M · 2010 to 2017
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM094770NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM094770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even relatively simple species have evolved mechanisms to organize individual organisms into communities, such that the fitness of the group is greater than the fitness of isolated individuals. Within the fungal kingdom, the ability of many yeast species to organize into communities is crucial for their growth and survival, and this property has important impacts both on the economy and on human health. Over the last few years, studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have revealed several fundamental properties of yeast communities. First, strain-to-strain variation in the structures of these groups is attributable in part to variability in the expression and functions of adhesin proteins. Second, the extracellular matrix surrounding these communities can protect them from environmental stress and may also be important in cell signaling. Finally, diffusible signals between cells contribute to community organization so that different regions of a community express different genes and adopt different cell fates. These findings provide an arena in which to view fundamental mechanisms by which contacts and signals between individual organisms allow them to assemble into functional communities.

Indexed as

AmmoniaApoptosisCell AdhesionCell CommunicationExtracellular MatrixGene Expression Regulation, FungalHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionAmmoniaReactive Oxygen SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21296916
PMCPMC3127636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.