Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21296174›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2011

Effects of pharmacological manipulations of NMDA-receptors on deliberation in the Multiple-T task.

Anna Blumenthal, Adam Steiner, Kelsey Seeland, A David Redish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Choice Behaviors and Prefrontal-Hippocampal Coupling Are Disrupted in a Rat Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Active Inference, epistemic value, and vicarious trial and error.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2016
    Article
  13. Vicarious trial and error.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  14. Manipulating Decisiveness in Decision Making: Effects of Clonidine on Hippocampal Search Strategies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna BlumenthalDrew University, USA. ABlumenthal@NKI.RFMH.ORG
Adam Steiner
Kelsey Seeland
A David Redish

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007234 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Paul G Mermelstein, Jocelyn M Richard · 1986 to 2026
$10.9M
Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR01MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007234NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080318NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH08318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both humans and non-human animals have the ability to navigate and make decisions within complex environments. This ability is largely dependent upon learning and memory processes, many of which are known to depend on NMDA-sensitive receptors. When humans come to difficult decisions they often pause to deliberate over their choices. Similarly, rats pause at difficult choice points. This behavior, known as vicarious trial and error (VTE), is hippocampally dependent and entails neurophysiological representations of expectations of future outcomes in hippocampus and downstream structures. In order to determine the dependence of VTE behaviors on NMDA-sensitive receptors, we tested rats on a Multiple-T choice task with a reward-delivery reversal known to elicit VTE. Rats under the influence of NMDA-receptor antagonists (CPP) showed a significant reduction in VTE, particularly at the reward reversal, implying a role for NMDA-sensitive receptors in the generation of vicarious trial and error behaviors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningChoice BehaviorCycloserineDecision MakingDiscrimination LearningExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsHippocampusMaleMaze LearningPiperazinesProblem SolvingRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acidCycloserineExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsPiperazinesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID21296174
PMCPMC3074592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.