Not just another genome.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. ORFanID: A web-based search engine for the discovery and identification of orphan and taxonomically restricted genes.PloS one · 2023
   Article
2. Food quantity and quality shapes reproductive strategies ofEcology and evolution · 2022
   Article
3. Bi-directional effects of vitamin BScientific reports · 2017
   Article
4. Ecotoxicogenomic approaches for understanding molecular mechanisms of environmental chemical toxicity using aquatic invertebrate, Daphnia model organism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
   Review
5. Competitive outcome of Daphnia-Simocephalus experimental microcosms: salinity versus priority effects.PloS one · 2013
   Article
6. Genomic identification of a putative circadian system in the cladoceran crustacean Daphnia pulex.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part D, Genomics & proteomics · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as