ArticleBMC public health2011
Prevalence and progression of visual impairment in patients newly diagnosed with clinical type 2 diabetes: a 6-year follow up study.
Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Fracture in Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Trial
- Associations between hearing and vision impairment and type 2 diabetes among middle-aged and older chinese adults: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Observational
- Association of Immune Cell Subsets with Incident Hip Fracture: The Cardiovascular Health Study.Calcified tissue international · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence screening in preventing vision loss from diabetes: a policy model.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Changes in Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Retinopathy During 1980-2019 Based on Nationwide Register Data.Diabetes care · 2022Article
- Visual functional defects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a questionnaire based cross-sectional study.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Impact of vision and hearing impairments on risk of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Article
- Impact of mobile health in diabetic retinopathy awareness and eye care behavior among Indigenous women.mHealth · 2020Article
- Serum erythropoietin concentration and its correlation with stage of diabetic retinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- The effect of hemodialysis on ocular changes in patients with the end-stage renal disease.Renal failure · 2019Article
- Social Determinants of Association among Diabetes Mellitus, Visual Impairment and Hearing Loss in a Middle-Aged or Old Population: Artificial-Neural-Network Analysis of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2014⁻2016).Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Visual impairment and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2019Article
- Four-year incidence and progression of visual impairment in a South Indian population with diabetes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Diabetic brain or retina? Visual psychophysical performance in diabetic patients in relation to GABA levels in occipital cortex.Metabolic brain disease · 2017Observational
- Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.Journal of community health · 2016Article
- Time trend of prevalence of self-reported cataract and its association with prolonged sitting in Taiwan from 2001 and 2013.BMC ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Is the indicator magnifying window for insulin pens helpful for elderly diabetic patients?Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany diabetic patients fear visual loss as the worst consequence of diabetes. In most studies the main eye pathology is assigned as the cause of visual impairment. This study analysed a broad range of possible ocular and non-ocular predictors of visual impairment prospectively in patients newly diagnosed with clinical type 2 diabetes.
methodsData were from a population-based cohort of 1,241 persons newly diagnosed with clinical, often symptomatic type 2 diabetes aged ≥ 40 years. After 6 years, 807 patients were followed up. Standard eye examinations were done by practising ophthalmologists.
resultsAt diabetes diagnosis median age was 65.5 years. Over 6 years, the prevalence of blindness (visual acuity of best seeing eye ≤ 0.1) rose from 0.9% (11/1,241) to 2.4% (19/807) and the prevalence of moderate visual impairment (> 0.1; < 0.5) rose from 5.4% (67/1,241) to 6.7% (54/807). The incidence (95% confidence interval) of blindness was 40.2 (25.3-63.8) per 10,000 patient-years. Baseline predictors of level of visual acuity (age, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataract, living alone, low self-rated health, and sedentary life-style) and speed of continued visual loss (age, AMD, diabetic retinopathy (DR), cataract, living alone, and high fasting triglycerides) were identified.
conclusionsIn a comprehensive assessment of predictors of visual impairment, even in a health care system allowing self-referral to free eye examinations, treatable eye pathologies such as DR and cataract emerge together with age as the most notable predictors of continued visual loss after diabetes diagnosis. Our results underline the importance of eliminating barriers to efficient eye care by increasing patients' and primary care practitioners' awareness of the necessity of regular eye examinations and timely surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.