Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21294756›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2011

The μ opioid receptor is not involved in ethanol-stimulated dopamine release in the ventral striatum of C57BL/6J mice.

Vorani Ramachandra, Francis Kang, Christine Kim, Alan S Nova, Ankur Bajaj, F Scott Hall, George R Uhl, Rueben A Gonzales

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE ESCALATION OF ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vorani RamachandraThe University of Texas at Austin, PHAR-Pharmacology, USA.
Francis Kang
Christine Kim
Alan S Nova
Ankur Bajaj
F Scott Hall
George R Uhl
Rueben A Gonzales
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Genetic Approaches To Characterizing Drug Responses And Vulnerabilities: MiceZIADA000165 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI UHL, GEORGE RICHARD · 2009 to 2016
$7.9M
Mu receptors and ethanol/dopamine interactionsR01AA014874 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI GONZALES, RUEBEN A. · 2004 to 2017
$2.7M
Modulation of Repeated Ethanol AdministrationU01AA013486 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI GONZALES, RUEBEN A · 2001 to 2005
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000165NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014874NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA 14874NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mu opioid receptor (MOR) has previously been found to regulate ethanol-stimulated dopamine release under some, but not all, conditions. A difference in ethanol-evoked dopamine release between male and female mixed background C57BL/6J-129SvEv mice led to questions about its ubiquitous role in these effects of ethanol. Using congenic C57BL/6J MOR knockout (KO) mice and C57BL/6J mice pretreated with an irreversible MOR antagonist, we investigated the function of this receptor in ethanol-stimulated dopamine release.

methodsMicrodialysis was used to monitor dopamine release and ethanol clearance in MOR -/-, +/+, and +/- . male and female mice after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 g/kg ethanol (or saline). We also measured the increase in dopamine release after 5 mg/kg morphine (i.p.) in male and female MOR+/+ and -/- mice. In a separate experiment, male C57BL/6J mice were pretreated with either the irreversible MOR antagonist beta funaltrexamine (BFNA) or vehicle, and dopamine levels were monitored after administration of 2 g/kg ethanol or 5 mg/kg morphine.

resultsAlthough ethanol-stimulated dopamine release at all the 3 doses of alcohol tested, there were no differences between MOR+/+, -/-, and +/- mice in these effects. Female mice had a more prolonged effect compared to males at the 1 g/kg dose. Administration of 2 g/kg ethanol also caused a similar increase in dopamine levels in both saline-pretreated and BFNA-pretreated mice. Five mg/kg morphine caused a significant increase in dopamine levels in MOR+/+ mice but not in MOR-/- mice and in saline-pretreated mice but not in BFNA-pretreated mice. Intraperitoneal saline injections had a significant, albeit small and transient, effect on dopamine release when given in a volume equivalent to the ethanol doses, but not in a volume equivalent to the 5 mg/kg morphine dose. Ethanol pharmacokinetics were similar in all genotypes and both sexes at each dose and in both pretreatment groups.

conclusionsMOR is not involved in ethanol-stimulated dopamine release in the ventral striatum of C57BL/6J mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasal GangliaDopamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFemaleMaleMiceMice, 129 StrainMice, CongenicMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutReceptors, Opioid, muDopamineEthanolReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID21294756
PMCPMC3655702
OpenAlexW2099117427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.