Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21293929›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2011

An evaluation of risk factors in pregnant women with Candida vaginitis and the diagnostic value of simultaneous vaginal and rectal sampling.

Ahmet Barış Guzel, Macit Ilkit, Refik Burgut, Ibrahim Ferhat Urunsak, Fatma Tuncay Ozgunen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antifungal Testing of VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Congenital Sepsis withMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Vulvovaginal Candidosis during Pregnancy: A Review.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Accuracy of the BD MAX™ vaginal panel in the diagnosis of infectious vaginitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. An Update on the Roles of Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmet Barış GuzelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey.
Macit Ilkit
Refik Burgut
Ibrahim Ferhat Urunsak
Fatma Tuncay Ozgunen
Cukurova University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the epidemiological characteristics of VVC among pregnant women. We conducted a prospective survey among 372 pregnant women to investigate the prevalence, clinical forms, etiological agents, and predisposing factors of VVC. In addition, we determined the relationship between vaginal and rectal flora by simultaneously obtaining one high vaginal swab and one rectal swab from each patient using sterile cotton-tipped swabs. Furthermore, we compared the recovery and identification performances of chromID Candida agar to Sabouraud dextrose agar with gentamicin and chloramphenicol. Clinically and mycologically confirmed cases of VVC were detected in 139 (37.4%) and vaginal colonization described in 42 (11.3%) of 372 pregnant women. Rectal cultures were also positive in 98 of the 139 (70.5%) VVC cases. Candida albicans and C. glabrata were identified in vaginal samples in 58.0 versus 19.0% and from rectal samples in 49.0 versus 13.5%, respectively. Increases in gestational week and gravidae were identified to be statistically significant in patients with acute VVC (AVVC) and symptomatic recurrent VVC (RVVC), and asymptomatic RVVC (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the laboratory diagnosis of VVC, specifically tailored chromogenic media are reliable tools for both the recovery and rapid identification of common Candida spp., particularly C. albicans, as well as for the detection of polyfungal populations in vaginal samples (P > 0.05). In addition, rectal colonization is a common finding in cases of AVVC and symptomatic-RVVC cases and corresponds well with the presence of the same yeast species in the vagina.

Indexed as

AdultCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidiasis, VulvovaginalCulture MediaFemaleHumansMycologyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceProspective StudiesRectumRisk FactorsVaginaCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID21293929
OpenAlexW1996838539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.