Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21293729›Full record

ArticleThe open biochemistry journal2010

Systematic comparison of crystal and NMR protein structures deposited in the protein data bank.

Kresimir Sikic, Sanja Tomic, Oliviero Carugo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open biochemistry journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. AlphaFold two years on: Validation and impact.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Nano letters · 2024
    Article
  9. Interpretation of Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  10. Easy Not Easy: Comparative Modeling with High-Sequence Identity Templates.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Core packing of well-defined X-ray and NMR structures is the same.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Expression, epitope prediction and IgE-binding of theExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kresimir SikicDepartement of Structural and Computational Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Vienna University, Austria.
Sanja Tomic
Oliviero Carugo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly all the macromolecular three-dimensional structures deposited in Protein Data Bank were determined by either crystallographic (X-ray) or Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopic methods. This paper reports a systematic comparison of the crystallographic and NMR results deposited in the files of the Protein Data Bank, in order to find out to which extent these information can be aggregated in bioinformatics. A non-redundant data set containing 109 NMR - X-ray structure pairs of nearly identical proteins was derived from the Protein Data Bank. A series of comparisons were performed by focusing the attention towards both global features and local details. It was observed that: (1) the RMDS values between NMR and crystal structures range from about 1.5 Å to about 2.5 Å; (2) the correlation between conformational deviations and residue type reveals that hydrophobic amino acids are more similar in crystal and NMR structures than hydrophilic amino acids; (3) the correlation between solvent accessibility of the residues and their conformational variability in solid state and in solution is relatively modest (correlation coefficient = 0.462); (4) beta strands on average match better between NMR and crystal structures than helices and loops; (5) conformational differences between loops are independent of crystal packing interactions in the solid state; (6) very seldom, side chains buried in the protein interior are observed to adopt different orientations in the solid state and in solution.

Indexed as

Large scale structure comparisonNMR spectroscopyProtein Data Bankstructure similarityX-ray crystallography.

Identifiers

PMID21293729
PMCPMC3032220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.