Advancing industrial livestock production: health effects research and sustainability.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Local and Global Public Health and Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in the USA: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
   Article
2. Ambient Ammonia Exposures in an Agricultural Community and Pediatric Asthma Morbidity.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations.2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as