Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21292809›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2011

Weight loss and self-regulatory eating efficacy in older adults: the cooperative lifestyle intervention program.

W Jack Rejeski, Shannon L Mihalko, Walter T Ambrosius, Lucille B Bearon, Jacquelyn W McClelland

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W Jack RejeskiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7868, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA. rejeski@wfu.edu
Shannon L Mihalko
Walter T Ambrosius
Lucille B Bearon
Jacquelyn W McClelland

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamie Nicole Justice · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
USE OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING TO MANAGE TYPE I DIABETESM01RR000211 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI HAK, EMILY B · 1985 to 2006
$9.6M
Cooperative Lifestyle Intervention Programs (CLIP-II)R18HL076441 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, ANTHONY P, REJESKI, WALTER JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Cooperative Lifestyle Intervention ProgramR01HL076441 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI REJESKI, WALTER JOHN · 2005 to 2009
$2.9M
NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00211NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076441NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL076441NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUsing the weight efficacy lifestyle questionnaire (WEL), we examined whether a group-mediated intervention for weight loss among older, obese adults resulted in changes in self-regulatory self-efficacy for eating behavior and whether these changes mediated weight loss.

methodsThis was a randomized controlled design, and 288 older adults received 1 of 3 treatments for 6 months: physical activity only (PA), weight loss + physical activity (WL + PA), or a successful aging (SA) health education program. The WEL was administered prior to randomization and again at the 6-month follow-up visit.

resultsA significant treatment effect was observed for the WEL, F (2249) = 15.11, p < .0001, partial eta2 = .11, showing that improvement occurred only in the WL + PA group as compared with PA and SA. Changes in WEL scores partially mediated the effects of the WL + PA intervention on weight loss. DISCUSSION: These results illustrate that WL + PA can be effective in improving older adults' self-efficacy for the self-regulation of eating behavior and that these changes are prospectively related to the amount of weight loss. Further research is warranted on an expanded concept of self-efficacy as well as controlled experimental studies on eating behavior in older adults.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorLife StyleSelf EfficacyWeight LossAgedDiet, ReducingExerciseFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity

Identifiers

PMID21292809
PMCPMC3078758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.