Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21292711›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

Effect of training traditional birth attendants on neonatal mortality (Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project): randomised controlled study.

Christopher J Gill, Grace Phiri-Mazala, Nicholas G Guerina, Joshua Kasimba, Charity Mulenga, William B MacLeod, Nelson Waitolo, Anna B Knapp, Mark Mirochnick, Arthur Mazimba and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00518856 (Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 23 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00518856 nacompletednot on this map

Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2006 to 2009Enrolled3,559ConditionsMortalityArmsNeonatal resuscitation protocol, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. When do newborns die? A systematic review of timing of overall and cause-specific neonatal deaths in developing countries.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christopher J GillCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. cgill@bu.edu
Grace Phiri-Mazala
Nicholas G Guerina
Joshua Kasimba
Charity Mulenga
William B MacLeod
Nelson Waitolo
Anna B Knapp
Mark Mirochnick
Arthur Mazimba
Matthew P Fox
Lora Sabin
Philip Seidenberg
Jonathon L Simon
Davidson H Hamer

Funding

co-Trimoxazole in Zambian Infants (TZI)K23AI062208 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GILL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2004 to 2007
$509k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI 62208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether training traditional birth attendants to manage several common perinatal conditions could reduce neonatal mortality in the setting of a resource poor country with limited access to healthcare.

designProspective, cluster randomised and controlled effectiveness study.

settingLufwanyama, an agrarian, poorly developed district located in the Copperbelt province, Zambia. All births carried out by study birth attendants occurred at mothers' homes, in rural village settings.

participants127 traditional birth attendants and mothers and their newborns (3559 infants delivered regardless of vital status) from Lufwanyama district.

interventionsUsing an unblinded design, birth attendants were cluster randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention had two components: training in a modified version of the neonatal resuscitation protocol, and single dose amoxicillin coupled with facilitated referral of infants to a health centre. Control birth attendants continued their existing standard of care (basic obstetric skills and use of clean delivery kits).

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of liveborn infants who died by day 28 after birth, with rate ratios statistically adjusted for clustering. Secondary outcomes were mortality at different time points; and comparison of causes of death based on verbal autopsy data.

resultsAmong 3497 deliveries with reliable information, mortality at day 28 after birth was 45% lower among liveborn infants delivered by intervention birth attendants than control birth attendants (rate ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.90). The greatest reductions in mortality were in the first 24 hours after birth: 7.8 deaths per 1000 live births for infants delivered by intervention birth attendants compared with 19.9 per 1000 for infants delivered by control birth attendants (0.40, 0.19 to 0.83). Deaths due to birth asphyxia were reduced by 63% among infants delivered by intervention birth attendants (0.37, 0.17 to 0.81) and by 81% within the first two days after birth (0.19, 0.07 to 0.52). Stillbirths and deaths from serious infection occurred at similar rates in both groups.

conclusionsTraining traditional birth attendants to manage common perinatal conditions significantly reduced neonatal mortality in a rural African setting. This approach has high potential to be applied to similar settings with dispersed rural populations. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00518856.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical CompetenceCluster AnalysisDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMiddle AgedMidwiferyPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21292711
PMCPMC3032994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.